Minimal Wide-Range Resistive Sensor-to-Microcontroller Interface for Versatile IoT Nodes
Open accessAbstract
Sensor interface is a term including all the circuits adopted for providing measurement readouts from sensor signals. Starting from early 2000s, a plethora of solutions, generally addressed as direct sensor-to-microcontroller interfaces, has been proposed. This concept is particularly intriguing given the widespread adoption of smart devices following the introduction of the Internet of Things (IoT) paradigm. However, the use of those strategies is often limited by the reduced input dynamic range they offer. In this paper, authors propose a novel universal interface for resistive sensors, able to provide an overall measurement range larger than 100 dB, combining consecutive sub-ranges leveraging on volt-amperometric and integral measurement approaches. The procedure for determining sub-ranges is detailed; error analysis for estimating the impact of (active components) nonidealities is furnished as well. Moreover, to evaluate feasibility and obtainable performance, a proof-of-concept prototype has been implemented. In particular, a relative error of 1.31% results for fixed resistor measurements ranging from less than 1 kΩ to more than 100 MΩ. The capability to track slowly-changing measurand (a common scenario in many IoT applications) has been also verified, given a maximum measurement time of about 0.6 s.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
A CMOS integrated low-voltage low-power time-controlled interface for chemical resistive sensors
De Marcellis, A., Depari, A., Ferri, G., Flammini, A., & Sisinni, E. (2013) · Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical · doi:10.1016/j.snb.2012.09.104 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Depari, A., Bellagente, P., Ferrari, P., Flammini, A., Pasetti, M., Rinaldi, S., & Sisinni, E.
- Affiliations
- University of Brescia (IT)
- ORCID
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement
- Published
- 2022
- Volume
- 71
- Pages
- 1-9
- ISSN
- 0018-9456 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9662
- OpenAlex
- W4285117241
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 0.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Brescia) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Project SWaRM-Net through the Ministero dell’istruzione, dell’università e della ricerca (MIUR) 2012 Smart Cities and Communities (SCN_00198)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Sensor Technology and Measurement Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Arduino and IoT Applications
- Keywords
- resistive sensors, integral measurements, Internet of Things nodes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review