Deep Learning for Unsupervised Anomaly Localization in Industrial Images: A Survey
Open accessAbstract
Currently, deep learning-based visual inspection has been highly successful with the help of supervised learning methods. However, in real industrial scenarios, the scarcity of defect samples, the cost of annotation, and the lack of a priori knowledge of defects may render supervised-based methods ineffective. In recent years, unsupervised anomaly localization algorithms have become more widely used in industrial inspection tasks. This paper aims to help researchers in this field by comprehensively surveying recent achievements in unsupervised anomaly localization in industrial images using deep learning. The survey reviews more than 120 significant publications covering different aspects of anomaly localization, mainly covering various concepts, challenges, taxonomies, benchmark datasets, and quantitative performance comparisons of the methods reviewed. In reviewing the achievements to date, this paper provides detailed predictions and analysis of several future research directions. This review provides detailed technical information for researchers interested in industrial anomaly localization and who wish to apply it to the localization of anomalies in other fields.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cui et al. [3] and Tao et al. [2] only employ image-level metrics, neglecting the anomaly localization performance of IAD.
“Nevertheless, Cui et al. [3] and Tao et al. [2] only employ image level metrics, neglecting the anomalies localization performance of IAD.”
From Deep Industrial Image Anomaly Detection: A Survey (2024) · cites this paper as [2]
Our survey uses twice as many IAD datasets as Tao et al. [2].
“Firstly, our study uses twice as many IAD datasets as Tao et al. [2]”
From Deep Industrial Image Anomaly Detection: A Survey (2024) · cites this paper as [2]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 128 · Cited by 228
- Authors
- Tao, X., Gong, X., Zhang, X., Yan, S., & Adak, C.
- Affiliations
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Beijing Technology and Business University (CN)
- Indian Institute of Technology Patna (IN)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement
- Published
- 2022
- Volume
- 71
- Pages
- 1-21
- ISSN
- 0018-9456 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9662
- OpenAlex
- W4289792391
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 128
- Citations by year
- 2026: 43 · 2025: 76 · 2024: 66 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 21.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018AAA0103004)
- Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation (4212044)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (62066004)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- industrial visual inspection, anomaly detection, industrial images, defect detection, deep learning, benchmark dataset, future research directions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review