Cited by 5Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit DesignSensor Technology and Measurement SystemsAdvanced Electrical Measurement Techniques

Performance Evaluation of Dual-Slope Digitizer for Self-Heating Compensation in Resistive Sensor

Singh, Gopal, Sohail, Shiraz, Joshi, Ashish Dineshkumar, Islam, Tarikul·2024·IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement

Abstract

This study addresses the prevalent issue of self-heating (S-H) error observed in resistive sensors$(R_{X})$when integrated with electronic circuits to produce output signals. An efficient digitizer circuit is proposed to interface$R_{X}$and compensate for the S-H error. The circuit employs a dual-slope integrator and a comparator to generate a time sequence output signal. The input current through$R_{X}$is maintained in the microampere range to minimize the S-H error. Additionally, a T-network is connected to the integrating capacitor to amplify the feedback path’s incoming current. The digitizer is tested for measuring in a wide range of$R_{X} 3.63$–488.2$\text{k}\Omega $, with corresponding power dissipation of 0.273 mW–$2.05 ~\mu \text{W}$, respectively. The current through$R_{X}$ranges from 274.59 to$2.05 ~\mu \text{A}$, and with the current boosting technique (gain ranging from 21.68 to 50.22), it requires a measurement time of 4.73–382.39 ms. This scheme reduces power dissipation by 472.6–1294.94 times compared to existing techniques, signifying a noteworthy improvement. The proposed digitizer produces accurate results with an average error of ±0.56% in experiments where negligible S-H is observed in testing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tim.2023.3348896

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 15 · Cited by 5

Authors
Singh, G., Sohail, S., Joshi, A. D., & Islam, T.
Affiliations
  • National Institute of Technology Tiruchirappalli (IN)
  • Jamia Millia Islamia (IN)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement
Published
2024
Volume
73
Pages
1-10
ISSN
  • 0018-9456 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9662
OpenAlex
W4390481170
Cited by
5
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4
FWCI
0.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement (publishedVersion)
Funders
Seed Grant of the National Institute of Technology Tiruchirappalli (NITT/R&C/SEED GRANT/2021-22/PROJ.NO.29)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Sensor Technology and Measurement Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Electrical Measurement Techniques
Keywords
resistive sensors, T-network, low-power measurement, comparator, resistance measurement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review