Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 348

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Adaptive EPI-Matching Cost for Light Field Disparity Estimation

Wang, Tun, Sheng, Hao, Chen, Rongshan, Cong, Ruixuan, Zhao, Mingyuan, Cui, Zhenglong·2024·IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement

Abstract

Light field (LF) technology captures information from multiple directions and angles, enabling precise disparity estimation. Recently, matching cost-based approaches have advanced rapidly and shown satisfactory results. However, these methods typically depend on fixed disparity candidates, leading to inadequate utilization of candidates and making them unsuitable for LF scenes with varying baselines. Multidirection line structures of epipolar-plane images (EPIs) associate multiple viewpoints, adaptively perceiving disparity ranges and accurately matching features in real scenes. In this article, we propose an adaptive EPI-matching cost (AEMC) for LF disparity estimation, which is proven to enhance the adaptability across datasets with varying baselines. Our approach calculates pixel-level disparity candidates to keep the predicted distribution near the ground truth (GT) and matches line structures to improve accuracy. Then, to enhance robustness during the adaptive process, we introduce an intra-EPI extraction module that dynamically establishes correlations in the local EPI while supplementing spatial information. Finally, we present a network named adaptive EPI-matching cost network (AEMCNet) for LF disparity estimation. Experimental results demonstrate that AEMCNet achieves state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance and robustness on various LF datasets with different baselines. Specifically, on the sparse LF dataset, our method reduces the mean square error (mse) by 49.6%.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tim.2024.3488147

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 41 references

Metadata

Authors
Wang, T., Sheng, H., Chen, R., Cong, R., Zhao, M., & Cui, Z.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement
Published
2024
Volume
73
Pages
1-13
ISSN
  • 0018-9456 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9662
OpenAlex
W4404294186
Cited by
348
References
41
FWCI
49.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adaptive EPI-Matching Cost for Light Field Disparity Estimation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tim.2024.3488147
The paper
Wang, T., Sheng, H., Chen, R., Cong, R., Zhao, M., & Cui, Z. (2024). Adaptive EPI-Matching Cost for Light Field Disparity Estimation. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement. https://doi.org/10.1109/tim.2024.3488147

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.