The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Adaptive EPI-Matching Cost for Light Field Disparity Estimation
Abstract
Light field (LF) technology captures information from multiple directions and angles, enabling precise disparity estimation. Recently, matching cost-based approaches have advanced rapidly and shown satisfactory results. However, these methods typically depend on fixed disparity candidates, leading to inadequate utilization of candidates and making them unsuitable for LF scenes with varying baselines. Multidirection line structures of epipolar-plane images (EPIs) associate multiple viewpoints, adaptively perceiving disparity ranges and accurately matching features in real scenes. In this article, we propose an adaptive EPI-matching cost (AEMC) for LF disparity estimation, which is proven to enhance the adaptability across datasets with varying baselines. Our approach calculates pixel-level disparity candidates to keep the predicted distribution near the ground truth (GT) and matches line structures to improve accuracy. Then, to enhance robustness during the adaptive process, we introduce an intra-EPI extraction module that dynamically establishes correlations in the local EPI while supplementing spatial information. Finally, we present a network named adaptive EPI-matching cost network (AEMCNet) for LF disparity estimation. Experimental results demonstrate that AEMCNet achieves state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance and robustness on various LF datasets with different baselines. Specifically, on the sparse LF dataset, our method reduces the mean square error (mse) by 49.6%.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Exploiting Generative AI to Scale up Intelligent Tutoring Systems
Jakubův, J., Chvalovský, K., Goertzel, Z., Kaliszyk, C., Olšák, M., Piotrowski, B., Schulz, S., Suda, M., & Urban, J. (2023) · DROPS (Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz Center for Informatics) · doi:10.4230/lipics.itp.2023.19 · Cited by 76,658
Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windows
Liu, Z., Lin, Y., Cao, Y., Hu, H., Wei, Y., Zhang, Z., Lin, S., & Guo, B. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.00986 · Cited by 35,534
Deformable DETR: Deformable Transformers for End-to-End Object Detection
Zhu, X., Su, W., Lu, L., Li, B., Wang, X., & Dai, J. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.04159 · Cited by 6,027 · cited 1×
“In recent years, transformers have been widely applied in various natural language processing and computer vision tasks [49], [50], [51], due to their superior ability to capture long-range dependencies in data.”
Levoy, M., & Hanrahan, P. (1996) · Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques · doi:10.1145/237170.237199 · Cited by 3,755
Epipolar-plane image analysis: An approach to determining structure from motion
Bolles, R. C., Baker, H. H., & Marimont, D. H. (1987) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/bf00128525 · Cited by 892
A Dataset and Evaluation Methodology for Depth Estimation on 4D Light Fields
Honauer, K., Johannsen, O., Kondermann, D., & Goldluecke, B. (2017) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-54187-7_2 · Cited by 642
Light Field Image Processing: An Overview
Wu, G., Masia, B., Jarabo, A., Zhang, Y., Wang, L., Dai, Q., Chai, T., & Liu, Y. (2017) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/jstsp.2017.2747126 · Cited by 586
Depth from Combining Defocus and Correspondence Using Light-Field Cameras
Tao, M. W., Hadap, S., Malik, J., & Ramamoorthi, R. (2013) · 2013 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.2013.89 · Cited by 506
Accurate depth map estimation from a lenslet light field camera
Jeon, H., Park, J., Choe, G., et al. (2015) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298762 · Cited by 464
Gershun, A. A. (1939) · Studies in Applied Mathematics · doi:10.1002/sapm193918151 · Cited by 440
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, T., Sheng, H., Chen, R., Cong, R., Zhao, M., & Cui, Z.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement
- Published
- 2024
- Volume
- 73
- Pages
- 1-13
- ISSN
- 0018-9456 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9662
- OpenAlex
- W4404294186
- Cited by
- 348
- References
- 41
- FWCI
- 49.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adaptive EPI-Matching Cost for Light Field Disparity Estimation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tim.2024.3488147
- The paper
- Wang, T., Sheng, H., Chen, R., Cong, R., Zhao, M., & Cui, Z. (2024). Adaptive EPI-Matching Cost for Light Field Disparity Estimation. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement. https://doi.org/10.1109/tim.2024.3488147
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.