The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Statistical Modeling of Complex Backgrounds for Foreground Object Detection
Abstract
This paper addresses the problem of background modeling for foreground object detection in complex environments. A Bayesian framework that incorporates spectral, spatial, and temporal features to characterize the background appearance is proposed. Under this framework, the background is represented by the most significant and frequent features, i.e., the principal features, at each pixel. A Bayes decision rule is derived for background and foreground classification based on the statistics of principal features. Principal feature representation for both the static and dynamic background pixels is investigated. A novel learning method is proposed to adapt to both gradual and sudden "once-off" background changes. The convergence of the learning process is analyzed and a formula to select a proper learning rate is derived. Under the proposed framework, a novel algorithm for detecting foreground objects from complex environments is then established. It consists of change detection, change classification, foreground segmentation, and background maintenance. Experiments were conducted on image sequences containing targets of interest in a variety of environments, e.g., offices, public buildings, subway stations, campuses, parking lots, airports, and sidewalks. Good results of foreground detection were obtained. Quantitative evaluation and comparison with the existing method show that the proposed method provides much improved results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Deep learning for unmanned aerial vehicle-based object detection and tracking: a survey
Wu, X., Li, W., Hong, D., Tao, R., & Du, Q. (2022) · IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine · doi:10.1109/mgrs.2021.3115137 · Cited by 421
Background subtraction in real applications: Challenges, current models and future directions
Garcia-Garcia, B., Bouwmans, T., & Rosales Silva, A. J. (2020) · Computer Science Review · doi:10.1016/j.cosrev.2019.100204 · Cited by 337
Understanding human intentions via hidden markov models in autonomous mobile robots
Kelley, R., Tavakkoli, A., King, C., Nicolescu, M., Nicolescu, M., & Bebis, G. (2008) · Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE international conference on Human robot interaction · doi:10.1145/1349822.1349870 · Cited by 181
NIC: A Robust Background Extraction Algorithm for Foreground Detection in Dynamic Scenes
Huynh-The, T., Banos, O., Lee, S., Kang, B. H., Kim, E.-S., & Le-Tien, T. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology · doi:10.1109/tcsvt.2016.2543118 · Cited by 51
Development of an Edge-Based Algorithm for Moving-Object Detection Using Background Modeling
Shin, W.-Y., Kabir, M. H., Hoque, M. R., & Yang, S.-H. (2014) · Journal of information and communication convergence engineering · doi:10.6109/jicce.2014.12.3.193 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, L., Huang, W., Gu, I. Y.-H., & Tian, Q.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
- Published
- 2004-11
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1459-1472
- ISSN
- 1057-7149 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2150489380
- Cited by
- 991
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.