The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Image decomposition via the combination of sparse representations and a variational approach
Abstract
The separation of image content into semantic parts plays a vital role in applications such as compression, enhancement, restoration, and more. In recent years, several pioneering works suggested such a separation be based on variational formulation and others using independent component analysis and sparsity. This paper presents a novel method for separating images into texture and piecewise smooth (cartoon) parts, exploiting both the variational and the sparsity mechanisms. The method combines the basis pursuit denoising (BPDN) algorithm and the total-variation (TV) regularization scheme. The basic idea presented in this paper is the use of two appropriate dictionaries, one for the representation of textures and the other for the natural scene parts assumed to be piecewise smooth. Both dictionaries are chosen such that they lead to sparse representations over one type of image-content (either texture or piecewise smooth). The use of the BPDN with the two amalgamed dictionaries leads to the desired separation, along with noise removal as a by-product. As the need to choose proper dictionaries is generally hard, a TV regularization is employed to better direct the separation process and reduce ringing artifacts. We present a highly efficient numerical scheme to solve the combined optimization problem posed by our model and to show several experimental results that validate the algorithm's performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sparse MRI: The application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging
Lustig, M., Donoho, D., & Pauly, J. M. (2007) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.21391 · Cited by 6,952
Self-citationImage segmentation using deep learning: A survey
Minaee, S., Boykov, Y. Y., Porikli, F., Plaza, A. J., Kehtarnavaz, N., & Terzopoulos, D. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2021.3059968 · Cited by 3,796
An Iterative Regularization Method for Total Variation-Based Image Restoration
Osher, S., Burger, M., Goldfarb, D., Xu, J., & Yin, W. (2005) · Multiscale Modeling & Simulation · doi:10.1137/040605412 · Cited by 1,787
Removing Rain from a Single Image via Discriminative Sparse Coding
Luo, Y., Xu, Y., & Ji, H. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.388 · Cited by 837
Image Inpainting : Overview and Recent Advances
Guillemot, C., & Le Meur, O. (2014) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2013.2273004 · Cited by 608
Metadata
- Authors
- Starck, J.-L., Elad, M., & Donoho, D. L.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
- Published
- 2005-10
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1570-1582
- ISSN
- 1057-7149 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2154996879
- Cited by
- 987
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 33.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Image decomposition via the combination of sparse representations and a variational approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tip.2005.852206
- The paper
- Starck, J.-L., Elad, M., & Donoho, D. L. (2005). Image decomposition via the combination of sparse representations and a variational approach. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tip.2005.852206
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.