The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multilinear Discriminant Analysis for Face Recognition
Abstract
There is a growing interest in subspace learning techniques for face recognition; however, the excessive dimension of the data space often brings the algorithms into the curse of dimensionality dilemma. In this paper, we present a novel approach to solve the supervised dimensionality reduction problem by encoding an image object as a general tensor of second or even higher order. First, we propose a discriminant tensor criterion, whereby multiple interrelated lower dimensional discriminative subspaces are derived for feature extraction. Then, a novel approach, called k-mode optimization, is presented to iteratively learn these subspaces by unfolding the tensor along different tensor directions. We call this algorithm multilinear discriminant analysis (MDA), which has the following characteristics: 1) multiple interrelated subspaces can collaborate to discriminate different classes, 2) for classification problems involving higher order tensors, the MDA algorithm can avoid the curse of dimensionality dilemma and alleviate the small sample size problem, and 3) the computational cost in the learning stage is reduced to a large extent owing to the reduced data dimensions in k-mode optimization. We provide extensive experiments on ORL, CMU PIE, and FERET databases by encoding face images as second- or third-order tensors to demonstrate that the proposed MDA algorithm based on higher order tensors has the potential to outperform the traditional vector-based subspace learning algorithms, especially in the cases with small sample sizes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Separating Style and Content with Bilinear Models
Tenenbaum, J. B., & Freeman, W. T. (2000) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/089976600300015349 · Cited by 840 · cited 1×
“Most traditional algorithms, such as the principal component analysis (PCA) [17], [20], [21], [24] and linear discriminant analysis (LDA)”
Method
Cited by
Tensor Decomposition for Signal Processing and Machine Learning
Sidiropoulos, N. D., De Lathauwer, L., Fu, X., Huang, K., Papalexakis, E. E., & Faloutsos, C. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tsp.2017.2690524 · Cited by 1,617
Maximum Neighborhood Margin Discriminant Projection for Classification
Gou, J., Zhan, Y., Wan, M., Shen, X., Chen, J., & Du, L. (2014) · The Scientific World Journal · doi:10.1155/2014/186749 · Cited by 744
Discriminative Multimanifold Analysis for Face Recognition from a Single Training Sample per Person
Lu, J., Tan, Y.-P., & Wang, G. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2012.70 · Cited by 334
Metadata
- Authors
- Yan, S., Xu, D., Yang, Q., Zhang, L., Tang, X., & Zhang, H.-J.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
- Published
- 2007-01
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 212-220
- ISSN
- 1057-7149 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2072509929
- Cited by
- 340
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multilinear Discriminant Analysis for Face Recognition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tip.2006.884929
- The paper
- Yan, S., Xu, D., Yang, Q., Zhang, L., Tang, X., & Zhang, H.-J. (2007). Multilinear Discriminant Analysis for Face Recognition. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tip.2006.884929
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.