The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ViBe: A Universal Background Subtraction Algorithm for Video Sequences
Open accessAbstract
This paper presents a technique for motion detection that incorporates several innovative mechanisms. For example, our proposed technique stores, for each pixel, a set of values taken in the past at the same location or in the neighborhood. It then compares this set to the current pixel value in order to determine whether that pixel belongs to the background, and adapts the model by choosing randomly which values to substitute from the background model. This approach differs from those based upon the classical belief that the oldest values should be replaced first. Finally, when the pixel is found to be part of the background, its value is propagated into the background model of a neighboring pixel. We describe our method in full details (including pseudo-code and the parameter values used) and compare it to other background subtraction techniques. Efficiency figures show that our method outperforms recent and proven state-of-the-art methods in terms of both computation speed and detection rate. We also analyze the performance of a downscaled version of our algorithm to the absolute minimum of one comparison and one byte of memory per pixel. It appears that even such a simplified version of our algorithm performs better than mainstream techniques.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Region Filling and Object Removal by Exemplar-Based Image Inpainting
Criminisi, A., Perez, P., & Toyama, K. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2004.833105 · Cited by 3,258 · cited 1×
“This process is common in inpainting, where objects are removed and values are taken in the neighborhood to fill holes [67].”
Background
Cited by
Deep learning in video multi-object tracking: A survey
Ciaparrone, G., Luque Sánchez, F., Tabik, S., Troiano, L., Tagliaferri, R., & Herrera, F. (2020) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2019.11.023 · Cited by 665
Background segmentation with feedback: The Pixel-Based Adaptive Segmenter
Hofmann, M., Tiefenbacher, P., & Rigoll, G. (2012) · 2012 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops · doi:10.1109/cvprw.2012.6238925 · Cited by 579
Detecting anomalous events in videos by learning deep representations of appearance and motion
Xu, D., Yan, Y., Ricci, E., & Sebe, N. (2017) · Computer Vision and Image Understanding · doi:10.1016/j.cviu.2016.10.010 · Cited by 474
A deep convolutional neural network for video sequence background subtraction
Babaee, M., Dinh, D. T., & Rigoll, G. (2018) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2017.09.040 · Cited by 406
Bouwmans, T., Javed, S., Sultana, M., & Jung, S. K. (2019) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2019.04.024 · Cited by 396
Metadata
- Authors
- Barnich, O., & Van Droogenbroeck, M.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
- Published
- 2011-06
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1709-1724
- ISSN
- 1057-7149 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0042
- OpenAlex
- W2127070222
- Cited by
- 1,885
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 53.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ViBe: A Universal Background Subtraction Algorithm for Video Sequences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tip.2010.2101613
- The paper
- Barnich, O., & Van Droogenbroeck, M. (2011). ViBe: A Universal Background Subtraction Algorithm for Video Sequences. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tip.2010.2101613
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.