The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Manifold Regularized Discriminative Nonnegative Matrix Factorization With Fast Gradient Descent
Abstract
Nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF) has become a popular data-representation method and has been widely used in image processing and pattern-recognition problems. This is because the learned bases can be interpreted as a natural parts-based representation of data and this interpretation is consistent with the psychological intuition of combining parts to form a whole. For practical classification tasks, however, NMF ignores both the local geometry of data and the discriminative information of different classes. In addition, existing research results show that the learned basis is unnecessarily parts-based because there is neither explicit nor implicit constraint to ensure the representation parts-based. In this paper, we introduce the manifold regularization and the margin maximization to NMF and obtain the manifold regularized discriminative NMF (MD-NMF) to overcome the aforementioned problems. The multiplicative update rule (MUR) can be applied to optimizing MD-NMF, but it converges slowly. In this paper, we propose a fast gradient descent (FGD) to optimize MD-NMF. FGD contains a Newton method that searches the optimal step length, and thus, FGD converges much faster than MUR. In addition, FGD includes MUR as a special case and can be applied to optimizing NMF and its variants. For a problem with 165 samples in R(1600), FGD converges in 28 s, while MUR requires 282 s. We also apply FGD in a variant of MD-NMF and experimental results confirm its efficiency. Experimental results on several face image datasets suggest the effectiveness of MD-NMF.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sparse coding with an overcomplete basis set: A strategy employed by V1?
Olshausen, B. A., & Field, D. J. (1997) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00169-7 · Cited by 3,642
Cited by
Nonnegative Matrix Factorization: A Comprehensive Review
Wang, Y.-X., & Zhang, Y.-J. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2012.51 · Cited by 981
Adaptive Hypergraph Learning and its Application in Image Classification
Yu, J., Tao, D., & Wang, M. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2012.2190083 · Cited by 405
Self-citationOnline Nonnegative Matrix Factorization With Robust Stochastic Approximation
Guan, N., Tao, D., Luo, Z., & Yuan, B. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2012.2197827 · Cited by 287
Self-citationGraph and Total Variation Regularized Low-Rank Representation for Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection
Cheng, T., & Wang, B. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2019.2936609 · Cited by 266
Metadata
- Authors
- Guan, N., Tao, D., Luo, Z., & Yuan, B.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
- Published
- 2011-07
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2030-2048
- ISSN
- 1057-7149 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0042
- OpenAlex
- W2144719328
- Cited by
- 318
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 43.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Manifold Regularized Discriminative Nonnegative Matrix Factorization With Fast Gradient Descent. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tip.2011.2105496
- The paper
- Guan, N., Tao, D., Luo, Z., & Yuan, B. (2011). Manifold Regularized Discriminative Nonnegative Matrix Factorization With Fast Gradient Descent. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tip.2011.2105496
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.