The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Level Set Method for Image Segmentation in the Presence of Intensity Inhomogeneities With Application to MRI
Open accessAbstract
Intensity inhomogeneity often occurs in real-world images, which presents a considerable challenge in image segmentation. The most widely used image segmentation algorithms are region-based and typically rely on the homogeneity of the image intensities in the regions of interest, which often fail to provide accurate segmentation results due to the intensity inhomogeneity. This paper proposes a novel region-based method for image segmentation, which is able to deal with intensity inhomogeneities in the segmentation. First, based on the model of images with intensity inhomogeneities, we derive a local intensity clustering property of the image intensities, and define a local clustering criterion function for the image intensities in a neighborhood of each point. This local clustering criterion function is then integrated with respect to the neighborhood center to give a global criterion of image segmentation. In a level set formulation, this criterion defines an energy in terms of the level set functions that represent a partition of the image domain and a bias field that accounts for the intensity inhomogeneity of the image. Therefore, by minimizing this energy, our method is able to simultaneously segment the image and estimate the bias field, and the estimated bias field can be used for intensity inhomogeneity correction (or bias correction). Our method has been validated on synthetic images and real images of various modalities, with desirable performance in the presence of intensity inhomogeneities. Experiments show that our method is more robust to initialization, faster and more accurate than the well-known piecewise smooth model. As an application, our method has been used for segmentation and bias correction of magnetic resonance (MR) images with promising results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
State of the art survey on MRI brain tumor segmentation
Gordillo, N., Montseny, E., & Sobrevilla, P. (2013) · Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1016/j.mri.2013.05.002 · Cited by 697
Yu, L., Guo, Y., Wang, Y., Yu, J., & Chen, P. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2016.2628401 · Cited by 96
A review of Methods for Bias Correction in Medical Images
Song, S., Zheng, Y., & He, Y. (2017) · Biomedical Engineering Review · doi:10.18103/bme.v3i1.1550 · Cited by 62
Feng, C., Zhao, D., & Huang, M. (2016) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-30858-6_20 · Cited by 24
Objective ventricle segmentation in brain CT with ischemic stroke based on anatomical knowledge
Qian, X., Lin, Y., Zhao, Y., Yue, X., Lu, B., & Wang, J. (2017) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2017/8690892 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, C., Huang, R., Ding, Z., Gatenby, J. C., Metaxas, D. N., & Gore, J. C.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
- Published
- 2011-07
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2007-2016
- ISSN
- 1057-7149 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0042
- OpenAlex
- W2132116135
- Cited by
- 1,285
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 67.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Level Set Method for Image Segmentation in the Presence of Intensity Inhomogeneities With Application to MRI. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tip.2011.2146190
- The paper
- Li, C., Huang, R., Ding, Z., Gatenby, J. C., Metaxas, D. N., & Gore, J. C. (2011). A Level Set Method for Image Segmentation in the Presence of Intensity Inhomogeneities With Application to MRI. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tip.2011.2146190
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.