The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bayesian Robust Principal Component Analysis
Abstract
A hierarchical Bayesian model is considered for decomposing a matrix into low-rank and sparse components, assuming the observed matrix is a superposition of the two. The matrix is assumed noisy, with unknown and possibly non-stationary noise statistics. The Bayesian framework infers an approximate representation for the noise statistics while simultaneously inferring the low-rank and sparse-outlier contributions; the model is robust to a broad range of noise levels, without having to change model hyperparameter settings. In addition, the Bayesian framework allows exploitation of additional structure in the matrix. For example, in video applications each row (or column) corresponds to a video frame, and we introduce a Markov dependency between consecutive rows in the matrix (corresponding to consecutive frames in the video). The properties of this Markov process are also inferred based on the observed matrix, while simultaneously denoising and recovering the low-rank and sparse components. We compare the Bayesian model to a state-of-the-art optimization-based implementation of robust PCA; considering several examples, we demonstrate competitive performance of the proposed model.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fischler, M. A., & Bolles, R. C. (1981) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/358669.358692 · Cited by 25,893
A Global Geometric Framework for Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction
Tenenbaum, J. B., Silva, V. D., & Langford, J. C. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.290.5500.2319 · Cited by 13,585
Cited by
Weighted Nuclear Norm Minimization and Its Applications to Low Level Vision
Gu, S., Xie, Q., Meng, D., Zuo, W., Feng, X., & Zhang, L. (2017) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-016-0930-5 · Cited by 816
Traditional and recent approaches in background modeling for foreground detection: An overview
Bouwmans, T. (2014) · Computer Science Review · doi:10.1016/j.cosrev.2014.04.001 · Cited by 676
Total-Variation-Regularized Low-Rank Matrix Factorization for Hyperspectral Image Restoration
He, W., Zhang, H., Zhang, L., & Shen, H. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2015.2452812 · Cited by 667
Nonlocal Image Restoration With Bilateral Variance Estimation: A Low-Rank Approach
Dong, W., Shi, G., & Li, X. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2012.2221729 · Cited by 655
Zhu, J., Ge, Z., Song, Z., & Gao, F. (2018) · Annual Reviews in Control · doi:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2018.09.003 · Cited by 308
Metadata
- Authors
- Ding, X., He, L., & Carin, L.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
- Published
- 2011-12
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3419-3430
- ISSN
- 1057-7149 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0042
- OpenAlex
- W2141159272
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 22.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.