The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
No-Reference Image Quality Assessment Using Visual Codebooks
Abstract
The goal of no-reference objective image quality assessment (NR-IQA) is to develop a computational model that can predict the human-perceived quality of distorted images accurately and automatically without any prior knowledge of reference images. Most existing NR-IQA approaches are distortion specific and are typically limited to one or two specific types of distortions. In most practical applications, however, information about the distortion type is not really available. In this paper, we propose a general-purpose NR-IQA approach based on visual codebooks. A visual codebook consisting of Gabor-filter-based local features extracted from local image patches is used to capture complex statistics of a natural image. The codebook encodes statistics by quantizing the feature space and accumulating histograms of patch appearances. This method does not assume any specific types of distortions; however, when evaluating images with a particular type of distortion, it does require examples with the same or similar distortion for training. Experimental results demonstrate that the predicted quality score using our method is consistent with human-perceived image quality. The proposed method is comparable to state-of-the-art general-purpose NR-IQA methods and outperforms the full-reference image quality metrics, peak signal-to-noise ratio and structural similarity index on the Laboratory for Image and Video Engineering IQA database.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity
Wang, Z., Bovik, A. C., Sheikh, H. R., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2003.819861 · Cited by 57,892
LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines
Chang, C.-C., & Lin, C.-J. (2011) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/1961189.1961199 · Cited by 40,918
No-reference quality assessment using natural scene statistics: JPEG2000
Sheikh, H. R., Bovik, A. C., & Cormack, L. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2005.854492 · Cited by 575
Cited by
Making a “Completely Blind” Image Quality Analyzer
Mittal, A., Soundararajan, R., & Bovik, A. C. (2013) · IEEE Signal Processing Letters · doi:10.1109/lsp.2012.2227726 · Cited by 6,766
No-Reference Image Quality Assessment in the Spatial Domain
Mittal, A., Moorthy, A. K., & Bovik, A. C. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2012.2214050 · Cited by 6,064
Blind Image Quality Assessment Using Joint Statistics of Gradient Magnitude and Laplacian Features
Xue, W., Mou, X., Zhang, L., Bovik, A. C., & Feng, X. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2014.2355716 · Cited by 641
MANIQA: Multi-dimension Attention Network for No-Reference Image Quality Assessment
Yang, S., Wu, T., Shi, S., Lao, S., Gong, Y., Cao, M., Wang, J., & Yang, Y. (2022) · 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) · doi:10.1109/cvprw56347.2022.00126 · Cited by 527
No-Reference Image Quality Assessment via Transformers, Relative Ranking, and Self-Consistency
Golestaneh, S. A., Dadsetan, S., & Kitani, K. M. (2022) · 2022 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) · doi:10.1109/wacv51458.2022.00404 · Cited by 465
Metadata
- Authors
- Ye, P., & Doermann, D.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
- Published
- 2012-07
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 3129-3138
- ISSN
- 1057-7149 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0042
- OpenAlex
- W2061513831
- Cited by
- 270
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 24.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: No-Reference Image Quality Assessment Using Visual Codebooks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tip.2012.2190086
- The paper
- Ye, P., & Doermann, D. (2012). No-Reference Image Quality Assessment Using Visual Codebooks. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tip.2012.2190086
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.