The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nonlocal Transform-Domain Filter for Volumetric Data Denoising and Reconstruction
Abstract
We present an extension of the BM3D filter to volumetric data. The proposed algorithm, BM4D, implements the grouping and collaborative filtering paradigm, where mutually similar d-dimensional patches are stacked together in a (d+1)-dimensional array and jointly filtered in transform domain. While in BM3D the basic data patches are blocks of pixels, in BM4D we utilize cubes of voxels, which are stacked into a 4-D "group." The 4-D transform applied on the group simultaneously exploits the local correlation present among voxels in each cube and the nonlocal correlation between the corresponding voxels of different cubes. Thus, the spectrum of the group is highly sparse, leading to very effective separation of signal and noise through coefficient shrinkage. After inverse transformation, we obtain estimates of each grouped cube, which are then adaptively aggregated at their original locations. We evaluate the algorithm on denoising of volumetric data corrupted by Gaussian and Rician noise, as well as on reconstruction of volumetric phantom data with non-zero phase from noisy and incomplete Fourier-domain (k-space) measurements. Experimental results demonstrate the state-of-the-art denoising performance of BM4D, and its effectiveness when exploited as a regularizer in volumetric data reconstruction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity
Wang, Z., Bovik, A. C., Sheikh, H. R., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2003.819861 · Cited by 57,892
Sparse MRI: The application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging
Lustig, M., Donoho, D., & Pauly, J. M. (2007) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.21391 · Cited by 6,952
Cited by
Artificial intelligence in the creative industries: a review
Anantrasirichai, N., & Bull, D. (2022) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-021-10039-7 · Cited by 793
Fast Hyperspectral Image Denoising and Inpainting Based on Low-Rank and Sparse Representations
Zhuang, L., & Bioucas-Dias, J. M. (2018) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/jstars.2018.2796570 · Cited by 363
PET image denoising using unsupervised deep learning
Cui, J., Gong, K., Guo, N., Wu, C., Meng, X., Kim, K., Zheng, K., Wu, Z., Fu, L., Xu, B., et al. (2019) · European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · doi:10.1007/s00259-019-04468-4 · Cited by 268
St-Jean, S., Coupé, P., & Descoteaux, M. (2016) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2016.02.010 · Cited by 74
Ji, K., Lin, W., Sun, Y., Cui, L.-S., Shamsi, J., Chiang, Y.-H., Chen, J., Tennyson, E. M., Dai, L., Li, Q., et al. (2023) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-023-00736-z · Cited by 36
“For BM4D 31 , we set the algorithm to the Gaussian distribution mode with an unknown noise s.d., while leaving other parameters at their default values.”
BackgroundInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Maggioni, M., Katkovnik, V., Egiazarian, K., & Foi, A.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
- Published
- 2013-01
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 119-133
- ISSN
- 1057-7149 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0042
- OpenAlex
- W1974438823
- Cited by
- 1,002
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 20.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nonlocal Transform-Domain Filter for Volumetric Data Denoising and Reconstruction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tip.2012.2210725
- The paper
- Maggioni, M., Katkovnik, V., Egiazarian, K., & Foi, A. (2013). Nonlocal Transform-Domain Filter for Volumetric Data Denoising and Reconstruction. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tip.2012.2210725
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.