The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Single Image Dehazing by Multi-Scale Fusion
Abstract
Haze is an atmospheric phenomenon that significantly degrades the visibility of outdoor scenes. This is mainly due to the atmosphere particles that absorb and scatter the light. This paper introduces a novel single image approach that enhances the visibility of such degraded images. Our method is a fusion-based strategy that derives from two original hazy image inputs by applying a white balance and a contrast enhancing procedure. To blend effectively the information of the derived inputs to preserve the regions with good visibility, we filter their important features by computing three measures (weight maps): luminance, chromaticity, and saliency. To minimize artifacts introduced by the weight maps, our approach is designed in a multiscale fashion, using a Laplacian pyramid representation. We are the first to demonstrate the utility and effectiveness of a fusion-based technique for dehazing based on a single degraded image. The method performs in a per-pixel fashion, which is straightforward to implement. The experimental results demonstrate that the method yields results comparative to and even better than the more complex state-of-the-art techniques, having the advantage of being appropriate for real-time applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Laplacian pyramid as a compact image code
Burt, P., & Adelson, E. (1983) · IEEE Transactions on Communications · doi:10.1109/tcom.1983.1095851 · Cited by 6,077
Cited by
Berman, D., Treibitz, T., & Avidan, S. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.185 · Cited by 1,642
Color balance and fusion for underwater image enhancement
Ancuti, C. O., Ancuti, C., De Vleeschouwer, C., & Bekaert, P. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2017.2759252 · Cited by 1,357
Self-citationNH-HAZE: An Image Dehazing Benchmark with Non-Homogeneous Hazy and Haze-Free Images
Ancuti, C. O., Ancuti, C., & Timofte, R. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) · doi:10.1109/cvprw50498.2020.00230 · Cited by 517
“Another direction of research in image dehazing includes those methods that restore the visibility of hazy image without assuming the optical model [38, 1, 17].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationFast Image Dehazing Method Based on Linear Transformation
Wang, W., Yuan, X., Wu, X., & Liu, Y. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Multimedia · doi:10.1109/tmm.2017.2652069 · Cited by 319
Dehazing Evaluation: Real-World Benchmark Datasets, Criteria, and Baselines
Zhao, S., Zhang, L., Huang, S., Shen, Y., & Zhao, S. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2020.2995264 · Cited by 169
Metadata
- Authors
- Ancuti, C. O., & Ancuti, C.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
- Published
- 2013-08
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 3271-3282
- ISSN
- 1057-7149 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0042
- OpenAlex
- W1971693194
- Cited by
- 726
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 26.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Single Image Dehazing by Multi-Scale Fusion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tip.2013.2262284
- The paper
- Ancuti, C. O., & Ancuti, C. (2013). Single Image Dehazing by Multi-Scale Fusion. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tip.2013.2262284
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.