The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Spectral Unmixing via Data-Guided Sparsity
Open accessAbstract
Hyperspectral unmixing, the process of estimating a common set of spectral bases and their corresponding composite percentages at each pixel, is an important task for hyperspectral analysis, visualization, and understanding. From an unsupervised learning perspective, this problem is very challenging-both the spectral bases and their composite percentages are unknown, making the solution space too large. To reduce the solution space, priors. In practice, these priors would easily lead to some unsuitable solution. This is because they are achieved by applying an identical strength of constraints to all the factors, which does not hold in practice. To overcome this limitation, we propose a novel sparsity-based method by learning a data-guided map (DgMap) to describe the individual mixed level of each pixel. Through this DgMap, the l(p) (0 < p < 1) constraint is applied in an adaptive manner. Such implementation not only meets the practical situation, but also guides the spectral bases toward the pixels under highly sparse constraint. What is more, an elegant optimization scheme as well as its convergence proof have been provided in this paper. Extensive experiments on several datasets also demonstrate that the DgMap is feasible, and high quality unmixing results could be obtained by our method.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso
Tibshirani, R. (1996) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x · Cited by 51,482
Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data Via the EM Algorithm
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x · Cited by 50,444
Donoho, D. L. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2006.871582 · Cited by 23,994
Book Review: Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning
Nasrabadi, N. M. (2007) · Journal of Electronic Imaging · doi:10.1117/1.2819119 · Cited by 22,066
Donoho, D. L. (2004) · Cited by 16,703
Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization
Lee, D. D., & Seung, H. S. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/44565 · Cited by 13,868
Variable Selection via Nonconcave Penalized Likelihood and its Oracle Properties
Fan, J., & Li, R. (2001) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/016214501753382273 · Cited by 8,900
Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning
(2007) · Kybernetes · doi:10.1108/03684920710743466 · Cited by 8,265
(2006) · Springer eBooks · Cited by 8,123
ALGORITHMS FOR NON-NEGATIVE MATRIX FACTORIZATION
Lee, D. D., & Seung, H. S. (2000) · Cited by 7,952
Cited by
Recent Advances in Hyperspectral Unmixing Using Sparse Techniques and Deep Learning
Zhang, S., Su, Y., Xu, X., Li, J., Deng, C., & Plaza, A. (2020) · Advances in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-38617-7_13 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhu, F., Wang, Y., Fan, B., Xiang, S., Meng, G., & Pan, C.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
- Published
- 2014-12
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 5412-5427
- ISSN
- 1057-7149 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0042
- OpenAlex
- W2009576740
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 49
- FWCI
- 18.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spectral Unmixing via Data-Guided Sparsity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tip.2014.2363423
- The paper
- Zhu, F., Wang, Y., Fan, B., Xiang, S., Meng, G., & Pan, C. (2014). Spectral Unmixing via Data-Guided Sparsity. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tip.2014.2363423
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.