The DOI matches its Crossref record.
SuBSENSE: A Universal Change Detection Method With Local Adaptive Sensitivity
Abstract
Foreground/background segmentation via change detection in video sequences is often used as a stepping stone in high-level analytics and applications. Despite the wide variety of methods that have been proposed for this problem, none has been able to fully address the complex nature of dynamic scenes in real surveillance tasks. In this paper, we present a universal pixel-level segmentation method that relies on spatiotemporal binary features as well as color information to detect changes. This allows camouflaged foreground objects to be detected more easily while most illumination variations are ignored. Besides, instead of using manually set, frame-wide constants to dictate model sensitivity and adaptation speed, we use pixel-level feedback loops to dynamically adjust our method's internal parameters without user intervention. These adjustments are based on the continuous monitoring of model fidelity and local segmentation noise levels. This new approach enables us to outperform all 32 previously tested state-of-the-art methods on the 2012 and 2014 versions of the ChangeDetection.net dataset in terms of overall F-Measure. The use of local binary image descriptors for pixel-level modeling also facilitates high-speed parallel implementations: our own version, which used no low-level or architecture-specific instruction, reached real-time processing speed on a midlevel desktop CPU. A complete C++ implementation based on OpenCV is available online.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Recognition in Terra Incognita
Beery, S., Van Horn, G., & Perona, P. (2018) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-01270-0_28 · Cited by 679
A deep convolutional neural network for video sequence background subtraction
Babaee, M., Dinh, D. T., & Rigoll, G. (2018) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2017.09.040 · Cited by 406
Interactive deep learning method for segmenting moving objects
Wang, Y., Luo, Z., & Jodoin, P.-M. (2017) · Pattern Recognition Letters · doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2016.09.014 · Cited by 334
Deep background subtraction with scene-specific convolutional neural networks
Braham, M., & Van Droogenbroeck, M. (2016) · 2016 International Conference on Systems, Signals and Image Processing (IWSSIP) · doi:10.1109/iwssip.2016.7502717 · Cited by 313
Foreground segmentation using convolutional neural networks for multiscale feature encoding
Lim, L. A., & Yalim Keles, H. (2018) · Pattern Recognition Letters · doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2018.08.002 · Cited by 305
Metadata
- Authors
- St-Charles, P.-L., Bilodeau, G.-A., & Bergevin, R.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
- Published
- 2015-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 359-373
- ISSN
- 1057-7149 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0042
- OpenAlex
- W1994634851
- Cited by
- 653
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 39.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SuBSENSE: A Universal Change Detection Method With Local Adaptive Sensitivity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tip.2014.2378053
- The paper
- St-Charles, P.-L., Bilodeau, G.-A., & Bergevin, R. (2015). SuBSENSE: A Universal Change Detection Method With Local Adaptive Sensitivity. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tip.2014.2378053
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.