Cited by 227Image and Video Quality AssessmentImage Retrieval and Classification TechniquesDigital Media Forensic Detection

CVD2014—A Database for Evaluating No-Reference Video Quality Assessment Algorithms

Open access
Nuutinen, Mikko, Virtanen, Toni, Vaahteranoksa, Mikko, Vuori, Tero, Oittinen, Pirkko, Hakkinen, Jukka·2016·IEEE Transactions on Image Processing

Abstract

In this paper, we present a new video database: CVD2014-Camera Video Database. In contrast to previous video databases, this database uses real cameras rather than introducing distortions via post-processing, which results in a complex distortion space in regard to the video acquisition process. CVD2014 contains a total of 234 videos that are recorded using 78 different cameras. Moreover, this database contains the observer-specific quality evaluation scores rather than only providing mean opinion scores. We have also collected open-ended quality descriptions that are provided by the observers. These descriptions were used to define the quality dimensions for the videos in CVD2014. The dimensions included sharpness, graininess, color balance, darkness, and jerkiness. At the end of this paper, a performance study of image and video quality algorithms for predicting the subjective video quality is reported. For this performance study, we proposed a new performance measure that accounts for observer variance. The performance study revealed that there is room for improvement regarding the video quality assessment algorithms. The CVD2014 video database has been made publicly available for the research community. All video sequences and corresponding subjective ratings can be obtained from the CVD2014 project page (http://www.helsinki.fi/psychology/groups/visualcognition/).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tip.2016.2562513

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CVD2014 and LIVE-Qualcomm only modeled capture distortions on small numbers of not very diverse unique contents.

    “These two databases, however, only modeled (camera) capture distortions on small numbers of not very diverse unique contents.”
  • CVD2014 consists of videos with in-the-wild distortions from 78 different video capture devices.

    “The first UGC-relevant VQA dataset containing authentic distortions was introduced as the Camera Video Database (CVD2014) [12], which consists of videos with in-the-wild distortions from 78 different video capture devices”
  • The FRIQUEE model has been observed to achieve SOTA performance on UGC/consumer video/picture databases like LIVEChallenge, CVD2014, and KoNViD-1k.

    “The FRIQUEE model [41] has been observed to achieve SOTA performance both on UGC/consumer video/picture databases like LIVEChallenge [14], CVD2014 [12], and KoNViD-1k [10] by leveraging a bag of NSS features drawn from diverse color spaces and perceptually motivated transform domains.”
  • TLVQM currently achieves SOTA performance on three UGC video quality databases, CVD2014, KoNViD-1k, and LIVE-Qualcomm, at a reasonably low complexity.

    “The model currently achieves SOTA performance on three UGC video quality databases, CVD2014 [12], KoNViD-1k [10], and LIVE-Qualcomm [13], at a reasonably low complexity, as reported by the authors.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 83 · Cited by 227

Authors
Nuutinen, M., Virtanen, T., Vaahteranoksa, M., Vuori, T., Oittinen, P., & Hakkinen, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
  • Microsoft (Finland) (FI)
  • Microsoft (United States) (US)
  • Aalto University (FI)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
Published
2016-07
Volume
25
Issue
7
Pages
3073-3086
ISSN
  • 1057-7149 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-0042
OpenAlex
W2063658831
Cited by
227
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 5
FWCI
12.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Image Processing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Video Quality Assessment
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
Keywords
video quality assessment, no-reference image quality assessment, video databases, quality dimensions, performance indicators, image quality assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review