CVD2014—A Database for Evaluating No-Reference Video Quality Assessment Algorithms
Open accessAbstract
In this paper, we present a new video database: CVD2014-Camera Video Database. In contrast to previous video databases, this database uses real cameras rather than introducing distortions via post-processing, which results in a complex distortion space in regard to the video acquisition process. CVD2014 contains a total of 234 videos that are recorded using 78 different cameras. Moreover, this database contains the observer-specific quality evaluation scores rather than only providing mean opinion scores. We have also collected open-ended quality descriptions that are provided by the observers. These descriptions were used to define the quality dimensions for the videos in CVD2014. The dimensions included sharpness, graininess, color balance, darkness, and jerkiness. At the end of this paper, a performance study of image and video quality algorithms for predicting the subjective video quality is reported. For this performance study, we proposed a new performance measure that accounts for observer variance. The performance study revealed that there is room for improvement regarding the video quality assessment algorithms. The CVD2014 video database has been made publicly available for the research community. All video sequences and corresponding subjective ratings can be obtained from the CVD2014 project page (http://www.helsinki.fi/psychology/groups/visualcognition/).
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
CVD2014 and LIVE-Qualcomm only modeled capture distortions on small numbers of not very diverse unique contents.
“These two databases, however, only modeled (camera) capture distortions on small numbers of not very diverse unique contents.”
From UGC-VQA: Benchmarking Blind Video Quality Assessment for User Generated Content (2021) · cites this paper as [12]
CVD2014 consists of videos with in-the-wild distortions from 78 different video capture devices.
“The first UGC-relevant VQA dataset containing authentic distortions was introduced as the Camera Video Database (CVD2014) [12], which consists of videos with in-the-wild distortions from 78 different video capture devices”
From UGC-VQA: Benchmarking Blind Video Quality Assessment for User Generated Content (2021) · cites this paper as [12]
The FRIQUEE model has been observed to achieve SOTA performance on UGC/consumer video/picture databases like LIVEChallenge, CVD2014, and KoNViD-1k.
“The FRIQUEE model [41] has been observed to achieve SOTA performance both on UGC/consumer video/picture databases like LIVEChallenge [14], CVD2014 [12], and KoNViD-1k [10] by leveraging a bag of NSS features drawn from diverse color spaces and perceptually motivated transform domains.”
From UGC-VQA: Benchmarking Blind Video Quality Assessment for User Generated Content (2021) · cites this paper as [12]
TLVQM currently achieves SOTA performance on three UGC video quality databases, CVD2014, KoNViD-1k, and LIVE-Qualcomm, at a reasonably low complexity.
“The model currently achieves SOTA performance on three UGC video quality databases, CVD2014 [12], KoNViD-1k [10], and LIVE-Qualcomm [13], at a reasonably low complexity, as reported by the authors.”
From UGC-VQA: Benchmarking Blind Video Quality Assessment for User Generated Content (2021) · cites this paper as [12]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 83 · Cited by 227
- Authors
- Nuutinen, M., Virtanen, T., Vaahteranoksa, M., Vuori, T., Oittinen, P., & Hakkinen, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Helsinki (FI)
- Microsoft (Finland) (FI)
- Microsoft (United States) (US)
- Aalto University (FI)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
- Published
- 2016-07
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 3073-3086
- ISSN
- 1057-7149 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0042
- OpenAlex
- W2063658831
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 83
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 5
- FWCI
- 12.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Image Processing (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Video Quality Assessment
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
- Keywords
- video quality assessment, no-reference image quality assessment, video databases, quality dimensions, performance indicators, image quality assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review