Cited by 218Advanced Image and Video Retrieval TechniquesImage Retrieval and Classification TechniquesMultimodal Machine Learning Applications

Large-Scale Cross-Modality Search via Collective Matrix Factorization Hashing

Ding, Guiguang, Guo, Yuchen, Zhou, Jile, Gao, Yue·2016·IEEE Transactions on Image Processing

Abstract

By transforming data into binary representation, i.e., Hashing, we can perform high-speed search with low storage cost, and thus, Hashing has collected increasing research interest in the recent years. Recently, how to generate Hashcode for multimodal data (e.g., images with textual tags, documents with photos, and so on) for large-scale cross-modality search (e.g., searching semantically related images in database for a document query) is an important research issue because of the fast growth of multimodal data in the Web. To address this issue, a novel framework for multimodal Hashing is proposed, termed as Collective Matrix Factorization Hashing (CMFH). The key idea of CMFH is to learn unified Hashcodes for different modalities of one multimodal instance in the shared latent semantic space in which different modalities can be effectively connected. Therefore, accurate cross-modality search is supported. Based on the general framework, we extend it in the unsupervised scenario where it tries to preserve the Euclidean structure, and in the supervised scenario where it fully exploits the label information of data. The corresponding theoretical analysis and the optimization algorithms are given. We conducted comprehensive experiments on three benchmark data sets for cross-modality search. The experimental results demonstrate that CMFH can significantly outperform several state-of-the-art cross-modality Hashing methods, which validates the effectiveness of the proposed CMFH.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tip.2016.2607421

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SSVH's similarity matrix is only constructed in the initialization stage without considering temporal information, which limits the improvement of hash code quality.

    “One of the main drawbacks is that the similarity matrix is only constructed in the initialization stage without considering the temporal information, which limits the improvement of hash code quality.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 59 · Cited by 218

Authors
Ding, G., Guo, Y., Zhou, J., & Gao, Y.
Affiliations
Tsinghua University (CN)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
Published
2016-11
Volume
25
Issue
11
Pages
5427-5440
ISSN
  • 1057-7149 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-0042
OpenAlex
W2512032049
Cited by
218
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 37
FWCI
21.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Image Processing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (61571269, 61271394)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
Keywords
collective matrix factorization, hashing, image-text retrieval, unsupervised hashing, supervised hashing, label information, large-scale search

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review