Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 924

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Underwater Image Enhancement by Dehazing With Minimum Information Loss and Histogram Distribution Prior

Li, Chong-Yi, Guo, Ji-Chang, Cong, Run-Min, Pang, Yan-Wei, Wang, Bo·2016·IEEE Transactions on Image Processing

Abstract

Images captured under water are usually degraded due to the effects of absorption and scattering. Degraded underwater images show some limitations when they are used for display and analysis. For example, underwater images with low contrast and color cast decrease the accuracy rate of underwater object detection and marine biology recognition. To overcome those limitations, a systematic underwater image enhancement method, which includes an underwater image dehazing algorithm and a contrast enhancement algorithm, is proposed. Built on a minimum information loss principle, an effective underwater image dehazing algorithm is proposed to restore the visibility, color, and natural appearance of underwater images. A simple yet effective contrast enhancement algorithm is proposed based on a kind of histogram distribution prior, which increases the contrast and brightness of underwater images. The proposed method can yield two versions of enhanced output. One version with relatively genuine color and natural appearance is suitable for display. The other version with high contrast and brightness can be used for extracting more valuable information and unveiling more details. Simulation experiment, qualitative and quantitative comparisons, as well as color accuracy and application tests are conducted to evaluate the performance of the proposed method. Extensive experiments demonstrate that the proposed method achieves better visual quality, more valuable information, and more accurate color restoration than several state-of-the-art methods, even for underwater images taken under several challenging scenes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tip.2016.2612882

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 924

Metadata

Authors
Li, C.-Y., Guo, J.-C., Cong, R.-M., Pang, Y.-W., & Wang, B.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
Published
2016-12
Volume
25
Issue
12
Pages
5664-5677
ISSN
  • 1057-7149 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-0042
OpenAlex
W2523532944
Cited by
924
References
3
FWCI
20.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Underwater Image Enhancement by Dehazing With Minimum Information Loss and Histogram Distribution Prior. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tip.2016.2612882
The paper
Li, C.-Y., Guo, J.-C., Cong, R.-M., Pang, Y.-W., & Wang, B. (2016). Underwater Image Enhancement by Dehazing With Minimum Information Loss and Histogram Distribution Prior. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tip.2016.2612882

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.