The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Graph Laplacian Regularization for Image Denoising: Analysis in the Continuous Domain
Open accessAbstract
Inverse imaging problems are inherently underdetermined, and hence, it is important to employ appropriate image priors for regularization. One recent popular prior-the graph Laplacian regularizer-assumes that the target pixel patch is smooth with respect to an appropriately chosen graph. However, the mechanisms and implications of imposing the graph Laplacian regularizer on the original inverse problem are not well understood. To address this problem, in this paper, we interpret neighborhood graphs of pixel patches as discrete counterparts of Riemannian manifolds and perform analysis in the continuous domain, providing insights into several fundamental aspects of graph Laplacian regularization for image denoising. Specifically, we first show the convergence of the graph Laplacian regularizer to a continuous-domain functional, integrating a norm measured in a locally adaptive metric space. Focusing on image denoising, we derive an optimal metric space assuming non-local self-similarity of pixel patches, leading to an optimal graph Laplacian regularizer for denoising in the discrete domain. We then interpret graph Laplacian regularization as an anisotropic diffusion scheme to explain its behavior during iterations, e.g., its tendency to promote piecewise smooth signals under certain settings. To verify our analysis, an iterative image denoising algorithm is developed. Experimental results show that our algorithm performs competitively with state-of-the-art denoising methods, such as BM3D for natural images, and outperforms them significantly for piecewise smooth images.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity
Wang, Z., Bovik, A. C., Sheikh, H. R., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2003.819861 · Cited by 57,892
Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms
Rudin, L. I., Osher, S., & Fatemi, E. (1992) · Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena · doi:10.1016/0167-2789(92)90242-f · Cited by 15,704
Scale-space and edge detection using anisotropic diffusion
Perona, P., & Malik, J. (1990) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.56205 · Cited by 12,119
De-noising by soft-thresholding
Donoho, D. L. (1995) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/18.382009 · Cited by 9,619
Image denoising by sparse 3-D transform-domain collaborative filtering
Dabov, K., Foi, A., Katkovnik, V., & Egiazarian, K. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2007.901238 · Cited by 9,283
Bilateral Filtering for Gray and Color Images
Tomasi, C., & Manduchi, R. (2002) · Sixth International Conference on Computer Vision (IEEE Cat. No.98CH36271) · doi:10.1109/iccv.1998.710815 · Cited by 8,177 · cited 2×
“Such a setting is, at a glance, similar to that of bilateral filtering [29].”
BackgroundMethodA Non-Local Algorithm for Image Denoising
Buades, A., Coll, B., & Morel, J.-M. (2005) · 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2005.38 · Cited by 7,616
On the generalized distance in statistics
Mahalanobis, P. C. (1936) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · Cited by 6,068
Image Denoising Via Sparse and Redundant Representations Over Learned Dictionaries
Elad, M., & Aharon, M. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2006.881969 · Cited by 5,321
Shuman, D. I., Narang, S. K., Frossard, P., Ortega, A., & Vandergheynst, P. (2013) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2012.2235192 · Cited by 4,421
Cited by
Quantifying the effect of experimental perturbations at single-cell resolution
Burkhardt, D. B., Stanley, J. S., Tong, A., Perdigoto, A. L., Gigante, S. A., Herold, K. C., Wolf, G., Giraldez, A. J., van Dijk, D., & Krishnaswamy, S. (2021) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-020-00803-5 · Cited by 226
Metadata
- Authors
- Pang, J., & Cheung, G.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
- Published
- 2017-04
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1770-1785
- ISSN
- 1057-7149 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0042
- OpenAlex
- W2571662414
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 48
- FWCI
- 9.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Graph Laplacian Regularization for Image Denoising: Analysis in the Continuous Domain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tip.2017.2651400
- The paper
- Pang, J., & Cheung, G. (2017). Graph Laplacian Regularization for Image Denoising: Analysis in the Continuous Domain. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tip.2017.2651400
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.