Cited by 483Machine Learning and Data ClassificationStatistical Methods and InferenceArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

Improved Random Forest for Classification

Paul, Angshuman, Mukherjee, Dipti Prasad, Das, Prasun, Gangopadhyay, Abhinandan, Chintha, Appa Rao, Kundu, Saurabh·2018·IEEE Transactions on Image Processing

Abstract

We propose an improved random forest classifier that performs classification with minimum number of trees. The proposed method iteratively removes some unimportant features. Based on the number of important and unimportant features, we formulate a novel theoretical upper limit on the number of trees to be added to the forest to ensure improvement in classification accuracy. Our algorithm converges with a reduced but important set of features. We prove that further addition of trees or further reduction of features does not improve classification performance. The efficacy of the proposed approach is demonstrated through experiments on benchmark datasets. We further use the proposed classifier to detect mitotic nuclei in the histopathological datasets of breast tissues. We also apply our method on the industrial dataset of dual phase steel microstructures to classify different phases. Results of our method on different datasets show significant reduction in average classification error compared to a number of competing methods.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tip.2018.2834830

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Paul, A., Mukherjee, D. P., Das, P., Gangopadhyay, A., Chintha, A. R., & Kundu, S.
Affiliations
  • Indian Statistical Institute (IN)
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • Tata Steel (India) (IN)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
Published
2018-08
Volume
27
Issue
8
Pages
4012-4024
ISSN
  • 1057-7149 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-0042
OpenAlex
W2802502226
Cited by
483
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 50 · 2025: 92 · 2024: 95 · 2023: 97 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 2
FWCI
12.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Image Processing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
random forest, number of trees, feature selection, feature importance, breast histopathology, phase classification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review