The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Two-Stream Convolutional Networks for Blind Image Quality Assessment
Abstract
Traditional image quality assessment (IQA) methods do not perform robustly due to the shallow hand-designed features. It has been demonstrated that deep neural network can learn more effective features than ever. In this paper, we describe a new deep neural network to predict the image quality accurately without relying on the reference image. To learn more effective feature representations for non-reference IQA, we propose a two-stream convolution network that includes two subcomponents for image and gradient image. The motivation for this design is using a two-stream scheme to capture different-level information of inputs and easing the difficulty of extracting features from one steam. The gradient stream focuses on extracting structure features in details, and the image stream pays more attention to the information in intensity. In addition, to consider the locally non-uniform distribution of distortion in images, we add a region-based fully convolutional layer for using the information around the center of the input image patch. The final score of the overall image is calculated by averaging of the patch scores. The proposed network performs in an end-to-end manner in both the training and testing phases. The experimental results on a series of benchmark datasets, e.g., LIVE, CISQ, IVC, TID2013, and Waterloo Exploration Database, show that the proposed algorithm outperforms the state-of-the-art methods, which verifies the effectiveness of our network architecture.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity
Wang, Z., Bovik, A. C., Sheikh, H. R., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2003.819861 · Cited by 57,892
Photo-Realistic Single Image Super-Resolution Using a Generative Adversarial Network
Ledig, C., Theis, L., Huszar, F., Caballero, J., Cunningham, A., Acosta, A., Aitken, A., Tejani, A., Totz, J., Wang, Z., et al. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.19 · Cited by 12,696
Multiscale structural similarity for image quality assessment
Wang, Z., Simoncelli, E. P., & Bovik, A. C. (2004) · The Thrity-Seventh Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems & Computers, 2003 · doi:10.1109/acssc.2003.1292216 · Cited by 6,253 · cited 3×
“Moreover, we let our method play the group MAximum Differentiation (gMAD) competition game [52] with two stateof-the-art NR-IQA methods MEON [25] and deepIQA [26] and one FR-IQA method MS-SSIM [6].”
MethodNo-Reference Image Quality Assessment in the Spatial Domain
Mittal, A., Moorthy, A. K., & Bovik, A. C. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2012.2214050 · Cited by 6,064
RRED Indices: Reduced Reference Entropic Differencing for Image Quality Assessment
Soundararajan, R., & Bovik, A. C. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2011.2166082 · Cited by 337
Cited by
COVID-19 Chest CT Image Segmentation -- A Deep Convolutional Neural Network Solution
Yan, Q., Wang, B., Gong, D., Luo, C., Zhao, W., Shen, J., Shi, Q., Jin, S., Zhang, L., & You, Z. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2004.10987 · Cited by 109
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Yan, Q., Gong, D., & Zhang, Y.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
- Published
- 2019-05
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2200-2211
- ISSN
- 1057-7149 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0042
- OpenAlex
- W2903193781
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 8.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Two-Stream Convolutional Networks for Blind Image Quality Assessment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tip.2018.2883741
- The paper
- Yan, Q., Gong, D., & Zhang, Y. (2019). Two-Stream Convolutional Networks for Blind Image Quality Assessment. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tip.2018.2883741
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.