Cited by 247Industrial Vision Systems and Defect DetectionGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisInfrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring

Multistage GAN for Fabric Defect Detection

Liu, Juhua, Wang, Chaoyue, Su, Hai, Du, Bo, Tao, Dacheng·2020·IEEE Transactions on Image Processing

Abstract

Fabric defect detection is an intriguing but challenging topic. Many methods have been proposed for fabric defect detection, but these methods are still suboptimal due to the complex diversity of both fabric textures and defects. In this paper, we propose a generative adversarial network (GAN)-based framework for fabric defect detection. Considering existing challenges in real-world applications, the proposed fabric defect detection system is capable of learning existing fabric defect samples and automatically adapting to different fabric textures during different application periods. Specifically, we customize a deep semantic segmentation network for fabric defect detection that can detect different defect types. Furthermore, we attempted to train a multistage GAN to synthesize reasonable defects in new defect-free samples. First, a texture-conditioned GAN is trained to explore the conditional distribution of defects given different texture backgrounds. Given a novel fabric, we aim to generate reasonable defective patches. Then, a GAN-based fusion network fuses the generated defects to specific locations. Finally, the well-trained multistage GAN continuously updates the existing fabric defect datasets and contributes to the fine-tuning of the semantic segmentation network to better detect defects under different conditions. Comprehensive experiments on various representative fabric samples are conducted to verify the detection performance of our proposed method.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tip.2019.2959741

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some supervised methods use limited abnormal samples to synthesize more abnormal samples for training.

    “In addition, some supervised methods use limited abnormal samples to synthesize more abnormal samples for training.”

    From Deep Industrial Image Anomaly Detection: A Survey (2024) · cites this paper as [154]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 47 · Cited by 247

Authors
Liu, J., Wang, C., Su, H., Du, B., & Tao, D.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • South China Normal University (CN)
  • Wuhan University (CN)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
Published
2020
Volume
29
Pages
3388-3400
ISSN
  • 1057-7149 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-0042
OpenAlex
W2994817145
Cited by
247
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 11
FWCI
14.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Image Processing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61601335, 61822113, 41871243)
  • National Key R&D of China (2018YFA060550)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (2018CFA050)
  • Science and Technology Major Project of Hubei Province (2019AEA170)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2017A030310437)
  • Special Project on Industrial Technology Innovation of Suzhou (SYG201714)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
Keywords
fabric defect detection, generative adversarial networks, semantic segmentation, data augmentation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review