Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 794

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A statistical theory of target detection by pulsed radar

Marcum, J.·1960·IEEE Transactions on Information Theory

Abstract

This report presents data from which one may obtain the probability that a pulsed-type radar system will detect a given target at any range. This is in contrast to the usual method of obtaining radar range as a single number, which can be taken mathematically to imply that the probability of detection is zero at any range greater than this number, and certainty at any range less than this number. Three variables, which have so far received little quantitative attention in the subject of radar range, are introduced in the theory: l.The time taken to detect the target. 2.The average time interval between false alarms (false indications of targets). 3.The number of pulses integrated. It is shown briefly how the results for pulsed-type systems may be applied in the case of continuous-wave systems. Those concerned with systems analysis problems including radar performance may profitably use this work as one link in a chain involving several probabilities. For instance, the probability that a given aircraft will be detected at least once while flying any given path through a specified model radar network may be calculated using the data presented here as a basis, provided that additional probability data on such things as outage time etc., are available. The theory developed here does not take account of interference such as clutter or man-made static, but assumes only random noise at the receiver input. Also, an ideal type of electronic integrator and detector are assumed. Thus the results are the best that can be obtained under ideal conditions. It is not too difficult, however, to make reasonable assumptions which will permit application of the results to the currently available types of radar. The first part of this report is a restatement of known radar fundamentals and supplies continuity and background for what follows. The mathematical part of the theory is not contained herein, but will be issued subsequently as a Separate report(2a)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tit.1960.1057560

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 794

Metadata

Authors
Marcum, J.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
Published
1960-04
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
59-267
ISSN
0018-9448 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2100819007
Cited by
794
References
0
FWCI
26.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A statistical theory of target detection by pulsed radar. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tit.1960.1057560
The paper
Marcum, J. (1960). A statistical theory of target detection by pulsed radar. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. https://doi.org/10.1109/tit.1960.1057560

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.