The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Consistency of an estimate of tree-dependent probability distributions (Corresp.)
Abstract
We demonstrate in this correspondence that the procedure introduced by Chow and Liu for estimating tree-dependent probability distributions is consistent.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Chow & Wagner (1973) show that the Chow-Liu algorithm is consistent, i.e, it recovers the true solution as the dataset size goes to infinity.”
From A Theory of Usable Information Under Computational Constraints (2020) · cites this paper as Chow & Wagner, 1973
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- 10.1109/TIT.1968.1054142 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Theory of Usable Information Under Computational Constraints
Xu, Y., Zhao, S., Song, J., Stewart, R., & Ermon, S. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2002.10689 · Cited by 142
Metadata
- Authors
- Chow, C., & Wagner, T.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
- Published
- 1973-05
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 369-371
- ISSN
- 0018-9448
- 1557-9654
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review