The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Lower bounds on the maximum cross correlation of signals (Corresp.)
Abstract
Some communication systems require sets of signals with impulse-like autocorrelation functions and small cross correlation. There is considerable literature on signals with impulse-like autocorrelation functions hut little on sets of signals with small cross correlation. A possible reason is that designers put too severe a restriction on cross correlation magnitudes. This correspondence establishes lower bounds on how small the cross correlation and autocorrelation can simultaneously be.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Enhanced uplink non-orthogonal multiple access for 5G and beyond systems
Liu, W.-J., Hou, X.-L., & Chen, L. (2018) · Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering · doi:10.1631/fitee.1700842 · Cited by 21
Sparsity-Aware Learning and Compressed Sensing: An Overview
Theodoridis, S., Kopsinis, Y., & Slavakis, K. (2014) · Academic Press Library in Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-396502-8.00023-1 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Welch, L.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
- Published
- 1974-05
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 397-399
- ISSN
- 0018-9448 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9654
- OpenAlex
- W2138548210
- Cited by
- 1,291
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lower bounds on the maximum cross correlation of signals (Corresp.). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tit.1974.1055219
- The paper
- Welch, L. (1974). Lower bounds on the maximum cross correlation of signals (Corresp.). IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. https://doi.org/10.1109/tit.1974.1055219
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
