The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Derivation and evaluation of improved tracking filter for use in dense multitarget environments
Abstract
When tracking targets in dense environments, sensor reports originating from sources other than the target being tracked (i.e., from clutter, thermal false alarms, other targets) are occasionally incorrectly used in track updating. As a result tracking performance degrades, and the error covariance matrix calculated on-line by the usual types of tracking filters becomes extremely unreliable for estimating actual accuracies. This paper makes three contributions in this area. First, a new tracking filter is developed that incorporates, in an a posteriori statistical fashion, all data available from sensor reports located in the vicinity of the track, and that provides both optimal performance and reliable estimates of this performance when operating in dense environments. The optimality of and the performance equations for this filter are verified by analytical and simulation results. Second, several computationally efficient classes of suboptimal tracking filters based on the optimal filter developed in this paper and on an optimal filter of another class that appeared previously in the literature are developed. Third, using an extensive Monte Carlo simulation, the various optimal and suboptimal filters as well as the Kalman filter are compared, with regard to the differences between the on-line calculated and experimental covariances of each filter, and with regard to relative accuracies, computational requirements, and numbers of divergences or lost tracks each produces.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
An algorithm for tracking multiple targets
Reid, D. (1979) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.1979.1102177 · Cited by 3,059
Fundamentals of Object Tracking
Challa, S., Morelande, M. R., Mušicki, D., & Evans, R. J. (2011) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511975837 · Cited by 416
Multi-target tracking using joint probabilistic data association
Fortmann, T., Bar-Shalom, Y., & Scheffe, M. (1980) · 1980 19th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control including the Symposium on Adaptive Processes · doi:10.1109/cdc.1980.271915 · Cited by 323
Long short-term memory-based deep recurrent neural networks for target tracking
Gao, C., Yan, J., Zhou, S., Varshney, P. K., & Liu, H. (2019) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2019.06.039 · Cited by 118
Metadata
- Authors
- Singer, R., Sea, R., & Housewright, K.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
- Published
- 1974-07
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 423-432
- ISSN
- 0018-9448 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9654
- OpenAlex
- W2162348049
- Cited by
- 252
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Derivation and evaluation of improved tracking filter for use in dense multitarget environments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tit.1974.1055256
- The paper
- Singer, R., Sea, R., & Housewright, K. (1974). Derivation and evaluation of improved tracking filter for use in dense multitarget environments. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. https://doi.org/10.1109/tit.1974.1055256
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.