Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 550

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

To code, or not to code: lossy source-channel communication revisited

Open access
Gastpar, M., Rimoldi, B., Vetterli, M.·2003·IEEE Transactions on Information Theory

Abstract

What makes a source-channel communication system optimal? It is shown that in order to achieve an optimal cost-distortion tradeoff, the source and the channel have to be matched in a probabilistic sense. The match (or lack of it) involves the source distribution, the distortion measure, the channel conditional distribution, and the channel input cost function. Closed-form necessary and sufficient expressions relating the above entities are given. This generalizes both the separation-based approach as well as the two well-known examples of optimal uncoded communication. The condition of probabilistic matching is extended to certain nonergodic and multiuser scenarios. This leads to a result on optimal single-source broadcast communication.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tit.2003.810631

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 550

Metadata

Authors
Gastpar, M., Rimoldi, B., & Vetterli, M.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
Published
2003-05
Volume
49
Issue
5
Pages
1147-1158
ISSN
0018-9448 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2148164553
Cited by
550
References
1
FWCI
28.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: To code, or not to code: lossy source-channel communication revisited. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tit.2003.810631
The paper
Gastpar, M., Rimoldi, B., & Vetterli, M. (2003). To code, or not to code: lossy source-channel communication revisited. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. https://doi.org/10.1109/tit.2003.810631

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.