The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On the Generalization Ability of On-Line Learning Algorithms
Abstract
In this paper, it is shown how to extract a hypothesis with small risk from the ensemble of hypotheses generated by an arbitrary on-line learning algorithm run on an independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) sample of data. Using a simple large deviation argument, we prove tight data-dependent bounds for the risk of this hypothesis in terms of an easily computable statistic M/sub n/ associated with the on-line performance of the ensemble. Via sharp pointwise bounds on M/sub n/, we then obtain risk tail bounds for kernel perceptron algorithms in terms of the spectrum of the empirical kernel matrix. These bounds reveal that the linear hypotheses found via our approach achieve optimal tradeoffs between hinge loss and margin size over the class of all linear functions, an issue that was left open by previous results. A distinctive feature of our approach is that the key tools for our analysis come from the model of prediction of individual sequences; i.e., a model making no probabilistic assumptions on the source generating the data. In fact, these tools turn out to be so powerful that we only need very elementary statistical facts to obtain our final risk bounds.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The perceptron: A probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain.
Rosenblatt, F. (1958) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0042519 · Cited by 12,280
A Probabilistic Theory of Pattern Recognition
Devroye, L., Györfi, L., & Lugosi, G. (1996) · Stochastic Modelling and Applied Probability · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-0711-5 · Cited by 3,274
On the Uniform Convergence of Relative Frequencies of Events to Their Probabilities
Vapnik, V. N., & Chervonenkis, A. Y. (1971) · Theory of Probability & Its Applications · doi:10.1137/1116025 · Cited by 2,448
Beating the hold-out: bounds for K-fold and progressive cross-validation
Blum, A., Kalai, A., & Langford, J. (1999) · Proceedings of the twelfth annual conference on Computational learning theory · doi:10.1145/307400.307439 · Cited by 265
Cited by
(2010) · Cited by 8,261
Foundations of Machine Learning
Mohri, M., Rostamizadeh, A., & Talwalkar, A. (2018) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/10290.001.0001 · Cited by 1,122
Introduction to Online Convex Optimization
Hazan, E. (2016) · Foundations and Trends in Optimization · doi:10.1561/2400000013 · Cited by 747
Improving Multi-Step Prediction of Learned Time Series Models
Venkatraman, A., Hebert, M., & Bagnell, J. (2015) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v29i1.9590 · Cited by 198
Differentially Private Meta-Learning
Li, J., Khodak, M., Caldas, S., & Talwalkar, A. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1909.05830 · Cited by 82
Metadata
- Authors
- Cesa-Bianchi, N., Conconi, A., & Gentile, C.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
- Published
- 2004-09
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2050-2057
- ISSN
- 0018-9448 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2109339818
- Cited by
- 426
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 11.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the Generalization Ability of On-Line Learning Algorithms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tit.2004.833339
- The paper
- Cesa-Bianchi, N., Conconi, A., & Gentile, C. (2004). On the Generalization Ability of On-Line Learning Algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. https://doi.org/10.1109/tit.2004.833339
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.