The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Iterative Multiuser Joint Decoding: Optimal Power Allocation and Low-Complexity Implementation
Abstract
We consider a canonical model for coded code-division multiple access (CDMA) with random spreading, where the receiver makes use of iterative belief-propagation (BP) joint decoding. We provide simple density-evolution analysis in the large-system limit (large number of users) of the performance of the BP decoder and of some suboptimal approximations based on interference cancellation (IC). Based on this analysis, we optimize the received user signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) distribution in order to maximize the system spectral efficiency for given user channel codes, channel load (users per chip), and target user bit-error rate (BER). The optimization of the received SNR distribution is obtained by solving a simple linear program and can be easily incorporated into practical power control algorithms. Remarkably, under the optimized SNR assignment, the suboptimal minimum mean-square error (MMSE) IC-based decoder performs almost as well as the more complex BP decoder. Moreover, for a large class of commonly used convolutional codes, we observe that the optimized SNR distribution consists of a finite number of discrete SNR levels. Based on this observation, we provide a low-complexity approximation of the MMSE-IC decoder that suffers from very small performance degradation while attaining considerable savings in complexity. As by-products of this work, we obtain a closed-form expression of the multiuser efficiency (ME) of power-mismatched MMSE filters in the large-system limit, and we extend the analysis of the symbol-by-symbol maximum a posteriori probability (MAP) multiuser detector in the large-system limit to the case of nonconstant user powers and nonuniform symbol prior probabilities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Factor graphs and the sum-product algorithm
Kschischang, F. R., Frey, B. J., & Loeliger, H.-A. (2001) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/18.910572 · Cited by 6,486 · cited 2×
“Standard results [24] show that if the dependency graph describing is cycle-free, then BP yields symbol-by-symbol maximum a posteriori (MAP) decisions with a finite number of iterations, thus minimizing the BER”
BackgroundMethod
Cited by
Interleave division multiple-access
Ping, L., Liu, L., Wu, K., & Leung, W. K. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · doi:10.1109/twc.2006.1618943 · Cited by 912
Metadata
- Authors
- Caire, G., Muller, R. R., & Tanaka, T.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
- Published
- 2004-09
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1950-1973
- ISSN
- 0018-9448 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2114908991
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 21.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Iterative Multiuser Joint Decoding: Optimal Power Allocation and Low-Complexity Implementation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tit.2004.833351
- The paper
- Caire, G., Muller, R. R., & Tanaka, T. (2004). Iterative Multiuser Joint Decoding: Optimal Power Allocation and Low-Complexity Implementation. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. https://doi.org/10.1109/tit.2004.833351
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.