The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clustering by Compression
Open accessAbstract
We present a new method for clustering based on compression. The method does not use subject-specific features or background knowledge, and works as follows: First, we determine a parameter-free, universal, similarity distance, the normalized compression distance or NCD, computed from the lengths of compressed data files (singly and in pairwise concatenation). Second, we apply a hierarchical clustering method. The NCD is not restricted to a specific application area, and works across application area boundaries. A theoretical precursor, the normalized information distance, co-developed by one of the authors, is provably optimal. However, the optimality comes at the price of using the noncomputable notion of Kolmogorov complexity. We propose axioms to capture the real-world setting, and show that the NCD approximates optimality. To extract a hierarchy of clusters from the distance matrix, we determine a dendrogram (ternary tree) by a new quartet method and a fast heuristic to implement it. The method is implemented and available as public software, and is robust under choice of different compressors. To substantiate our claims of universality and robustness, we report evidence of successful application in areas as diverse as genomics, virology, languages, literature, music, handwritten digits, astronomy, and combinations of objects from completely different domains, using statistical, dictionary, and block sorting compressors. In genomics, we presented new evidence for major questions in Mammalian evolution, based on whole-mitochondrial genomic analysis: the Eutherian orders and the Marsupionta hypothesis against the Theria hypothesis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Genome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies.
Rokas, A., Williams, B. L., King, N., & Carroll, S. B. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02053 · Cited by 1,512
Cited by
The Google Similarity Distance
Cilibrasi, R. L., & Vitanyi, P. M. B. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2007.48 · Cited by 1,760
Self-citationA survey of modern authorship attribution methods
Stamatatos, E. (2009) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.21001 · Cited by 1,176
Formal theory of creativity, fun, and intrinsic motivation (1990–2010)
Schmidhuber, J. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development · doi:10.1109/tamd.2010.2056368 · Cited by 747
Connecting users across social media sites: a behavioral-modeling approach
Zafarani, R., & Liu, H. (2013) · Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining · doi:10.1145/2487575.2487648 · Cited by 408
Paulovich, F. V., Nonato, L. G., Minghim, R., & Levkowitz, H. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2007.70443 · Cited by 316
Metadata
- Authors
- Cilibrasi, R., & Vitanyi, P. M. B.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
- Published
- 2005-04
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1523-1545
- ISSN
- 0018-9448 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2128859735
- Cited by
- 1,188
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 56.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clustering by Compression. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tit.2005.844059
- The paper
- Cilibrasi, R., & Vitanyi, P. M. B. (2005). Clustering by Compression. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. https://doi.org/10.1109/tit.2005.844059
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.