The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A New Class of Upper Bounds on the Log Partition Function
Abstract
We introduce a new class of upper bounds on the log partition function of a Markov random field (MRF). This quantity plays an important role in various contexts, including approximating marginal distributions, parameter estimation, combinatorial enumeration, statistical decision theory, and large-deviations bounds. Our derivation is based on concepts from convex duality and information geometry: in particular, it exploits mixtures of distributions in the exponential domain, and the Legendre mapping between exponential and mean parameters. In the special case of convex combinations of tree-structured distributions, we obtain a family of variational problems, similar to the Bethe variational problem, but distinguished by the following desirable properties: i) they are convex, and have a unique global optimum; and ii) the optimum gives an upper bound on the log partition function. This optimum is defined by stationary conditions very similar to those defining fixed points of the sum-product algorithm, or more generally, any local optimum of the Bethe variational problem. As with sum-product fixed points, the elements of the optimizing argument can be used as approximations to the marginals of the original model. The analysis extends naturally to convex combinations of hypertree-structured distributions, thereby establishing links to Kikuchi approximations and variants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Factor graphs and the sum-product algorithm
Kschischang, F. R., Frey, B. J., & Loeliger, H.-A. (2001) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/18.910572 · Cited by 6,486 · cited 1×
“, [23], [30] can be formulated as a method for attempting to solve this Bethe variational problem.”
MethodAn Introduction to Variational Methods for Graphical Models
Jordan, M. I., Ghahramani, Z., Jaakkola, T. S., & Saul, L. K. (1999) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1007665907178 · Cited by 3,791
Self-citationLauritzen, S. L. (1996) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198522195.001.0001 · Cited by 2,976
Biggs, N. (1974) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511608704 · Cited by 2,940
Cited by
Discrete temporal models of social networks
Hanneke, S., Fu, W., & Xing, E. P. (2010) · Electronic Journal of Statistics · doi:10.1214/09-ejs548 · Cited by 587
On the quantitative analysis of deep belief networks
Salakhutdinov, R., & Murray, I. (2008) · Proceedings of the 25th international conference on Machine learning - ICML '08 · doi:10.1145/1390156.1390266 · Cited by 411
Message Passing Algorithms for Scalable Multitarget Tracking
Meyer, F., Kropfreiter, T., Williams, J. L., Lau, R., Hlawatsch, F., Braca, P., & Win, M. Z. (2018) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2018.2789427 · Cited by 355
Wiebe, N., Kapoor, A., & Svore, K. M. (2016) · Quantum Information and Computation · doi:10.26421/qic16.7-8-1 · Cited by 85
Utilizing Variational Optimization to Learn Markov Random Fields
Tappen, M. F. (2007) · 2007 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2007.383037 · Cited by 54
Metadata
- Authors
- Wainwright, M. J., Jaakkola, T. S., & Willsky, A. S.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
- Published
- 2005-07
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2313-2335
- ISSN
- 0018-9448 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2135094946
- Cited by
- 381
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 23.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A New Class of Upper Bounds on the Log Partition Function. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tit.2005.850091
- The paper
- Wainwright, M. J., Jaakkola, T. S., & Willsky, A. S. (2005). A New Class of Upper Bounds on the Log Partition Function. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. https://doi.org/10.1109/tit.2005.850091
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.