The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Effect of Fading, Channel Inversion, and Threshold Scheduling on Ad Hoc Networks
Abstract
This paper addresses three issues in the field ofad hocnetwork capacity: the impact of (i) channel fading, (ii) channel inversion power control, and (iii) threshold–based scheduling on capacity. Channel inversion and threshold scheduling may be viewed as simple ways to exploit channel state information (CSI) without requiring cooperation across transmitters. We use thetransmission capacity(TC) as our metric, defined as the maximum spatial intensity of successful simultaneous transmissions subject to a constraint on the outage probability (OP). By assuming the nodes are located on the infinite plane according to a Poisson process, we are able to employ tools from stochastic geometry to obtain asymptotically tight bounds on the distribution of the signal-to-interference (SIR) level, yielding in turn tight bounds on the OP (relative to a given SIR threshold) and the TC. We demonstrate that in the absence of CSI, fading can significantly reduce the TC and somewhat surprisingly, channel inversion only makes matters worse. We develop a threshold-based transmission rule where transmitters are active only if the channel to their receiver is acceptably strong, obtain expressions for the optimal threshold, and show that this simple, fully distributed scheme can significantly reduce the effect of fading.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Stochastic geometry and random graphs for the analysis and design of wireless networks
Haenggi, M., Andrews, J. G., Baccelli, F., Dousse, O., & Franceschetti, M. (2009) · IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications · doi:10.1109/jsac.2009.090902 · Cited by 1,719
Self-citationUplink capacity and interference avoidance for two-tier femtocell networks
Chandrasekhar, V., & Andrews, J. G. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · doi:10.1109/twc.2009.070475 · Cited by 526
Self-citationAn Overview of the Transmission Capacity of Wireless Networks
Weber, S., Andrews, J. G., & Jindal, N. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Communications · doi:10.1109/tcomm.2010.093010.090478 · Cited by 422
Self-citationSakr, A. H., & Hossain, E. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Communications · doi:10.1109/tcomm.2015.2411266 · Cited by 349
Transmission capacity of ad hoc networks with spatial diversity
Hunter, A. M., Andrews, J. G., & Weber, S. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · doi:10.1109/t-wc.2008.071047 · Cited by 329
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Weber, S., Andrews, J. G., & Jindal, N.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
- Published
- 2007-11
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 4127-4149
- ISSN
- 0018-9448 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9654
- OpenAlex
- W2115094114
- Cited by
- 322
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 44.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Effect of Fading, Channel Inversion, and Threshold Scheduling on Ad Hoc Networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tit.2007.907482
- The paper
- Weber, S., Andrews, J. G., & Jindal, N. (2007). The Effect of Fading, Channel Inversion, and Threshold Scheduling on Ad Hoc Networks. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. https://doi.org/10.1109/tit.2007.907482
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.