The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On the Secrecy Capacity of Fading Channels
Abstract
We consider the secure transmission of information over an ergodic fading channel in the presence of an eavesdropper. Our eavesdropper can be viewed as the wireless counterpart of Wyner's wiretapper. The secrecy capacity of such a system is characterized under the assumption of asymptotically long coherence intervals. We first consider the full channel state information (CSI) case, where the transmitter has access to the channel gains of the legitimate receiver and the eavesdropper. The secrecy capacity under this full CSI assumption serves as an upper bound for the secrecy capacity when only the CSI of the legitimate receiver is known at the transmitter, which is characterized next. In each scenario, the perfect secrecy capacity is obtained along with the optimal power and rate allocation strategies. We then propose a low-complexity on/off power allocation strategy that achieves near-optimal performance with only the main channel CSI. More specifically, this scheme is shown to be asymptotically optimal as the average signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) goes to infinity, and interestingly, is shown to attain the secrecy capacity under the full CSI assumption. Overall, channel fading has a positive impact on the secrecy capacity and rate adaptation, based on the main channel CSI, is critical in facilitating secure communications over slow fading channels.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Boyd, S., & Vandenberghe, L. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511804441 · Cited by 56,601
Communication Theory of Secrecy Systems
Shannon, C. E. (1949) · Bell System Technical Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1949.tb00928.x · Cited by 9,440 · cited 3×
“However, it was later shown by Wyner in [2] that this negative result was a consequence of the over-restrictive model used in [1].”
BackgroundResult
Cited by
Secure Communication Over Fading Channels
Liang, Y., Poor, H. V., & Shamai, S. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2008.921678 · Cited by 937
A Survey on Multiple-Antenna Techniques for Physical Layer Security
Chen, X., Ng, D. W. K., Gerstacker, W. H., & Chen, H.-H. (2017) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2016.2633387 · Cited by 474
Mukherjee, A. (2015) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2015.2466548 · Cited by 347
Physical-Layer Security in Space Information Networks: A Survey
Li, B., Fei, Z., Zhou, C., & Zhang, Y. (2020) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2019.2943900 · Cited by 267
Energy-efficient mechanisms in security of the internet of things: A survey
Hellaoui, H., Koudil, M., & Bouabdallah, A. (2017) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2017.08.006 · Cited by 61
Metadata
- Authors
- Gopala, P. K., Lai, L., & El Gamal, H.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
- Published
- 2008-10
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 4687-4698
- ISSN
- 0018-9448 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2080693943
- Cited by
- 1,261
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 57.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the Secrecy Capacity of Fading Channels. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tit.2008.928990
- The paper
- Gopala, P. K., Lai, L., & El Gamal, H. (2008). On the Secrecy Capacity of Fading Channels. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. https://doi.org/10.1109/tit.2008.928990
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.