The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fast Solution of $\ell _{1}$-Norm Minimization Problems When the Solution May Be Sparse
Abstract
The minimum lscr1-norm solution to an underdetermined system of linear equationsy=Axis often, remarkably, also the sparsest solution to that system. This sparsity-seeking property is of interest in signal processing and information transmission. However, general-purpose optimizers are much too slow for lscr1minimization in many large-scale applications.In this paper, the Homotopy method, originally proposed by Osborne et al. and Efron et al., is applied to the underdetermined lscr1-minimization problem min parxpar1subject toy=Ax. Homotopy is shown to run much more rapidly than general-purpose LP solvers when sufficient sparsity is present. Indeed, the method often has the followingk-step solution property: if the underlying solution has onlyknonzeros, the Homotopy method reaches that solution in onlykiterative steps. Thisk-step solution property is demonstrated for several ensembles of matrices, including incoherent matrices, uniform spherical matrices, and partial orthogonal matrices. These results imply that Homotopy may be used to rapidly decode error-correcting codes in a stylized communication system with a computational budget constraint. The approach also sheds light on the evident parallelism in results on lscr1minimization and orthogonal matching pursuit (OMP), and aids in explaining the inherent relations between Homotopy, least angle regression (LARS), OMP, and polytope faces pursuit.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso
Tibshirani, R. (1996) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x · Cited by 51,482
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Friedman, J., & Tibshirani, R. (2001) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-21606-5 · Cited by 24,162
Cited by
Subspace Pursuit for Compressive Sensing Signal Reconstruction
Dai, W., & Milenkovic, O. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2009.2016006 · Cited by 2,388
Visual Place Recognition: A Survey
Lowry, S., Sünderhauf, N., Newman, P., Leonard, J. J., Cox, D., Corke, P., & Milford, M. J. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics · doi:10.1109/tro.2015.2496823 · Cited by 1,079
Fast ℓ1-minimization algorithms and an application in robust face recognition: A review
Yang, A. Y., Sastry, S. S., Ganesh, A., & Ma, Y. (2010) · 2010 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/icip.2010.5651522 · Cited by 414
Fast $\ell_{1}$-Minimization Algorithms for Robust Face Recognition
Yang, A. Y., Zhou, Z., Balasubramanian, A. G., Sastry, S. S., & Ma, Y. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2013.2262292 · Cited by 341
A Review of Sparse Recovery Algorithms
Crespo Marques, E., Maciel, N., Naviner, L., Cai, H., & Yang, J. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2886471 · Cited by 268
Metadata
- Authors
- Donoho, D. L., & Tsaig, Y.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
- Published
- 2008-11
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 4789-4812
- ISSN
- 0018-9448 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2098012923
- Cited by
- 829
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 53.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fast Solution of $\ell _{1}$-Norm Minimization Problems When the Solution May Be Sparse. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tit.2008.929958
- The paper
- Donoho, D. L., & Tsaig, Y. (2008). Fast Solution of $\ell _{1}$-Norm Minimization Problems When the Solution May Be Sparse. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. https://doi.org/10.1109/tit.2008.929958
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.