The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Information-Theoretic Limits on Sparsity Recovery in the High-Dimensional and Noisy Setting
Open accessAbstract
The problem of sparsity pattern or support set recovery refers to estimating the set of nonzero coefficients of an unknown vector beta* isin Ropfpbased on a set of n noisy observations. It arises in a variety of settings, including subset selection in regression, graphical model selection, signal denoising, compressive sensing, and constructive approximation. The sample complexity of a given method for subset recovery refers to the scaling of the required sample size n as a function of the signal dimension p, sparsity index k (number of non-zeroes in beta*), as well as the minimum value betaminof beta* over its support and other parameters of measurement matrix. This paper studies the information-theoretic limits of sparsity recovery: in particular, for a noisy linear observation model based on random measurement matrices drawn from general Gaussian measurement matrices, we derive both a set of sufficient conditions for exact support recovery using an exhaustive search decoder, as well as a set of necessary conditions that any decoder, regardless of its computational complexity, must satisfy for exact support recovery. This analysis of fundamental limits complements our previous work on sharp thresholds for support set recovery over the same set of random measurement ensembles using the polynomial-time Lasso method (lscr1-constrained quadratic programming).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso
Tibshirani, R. (1996) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x · Cited by 51,482
Elements of Information Theory
Cover, T. M., & Thomas, J. A. (2001) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/0471200611 · Cited by 36,808
Donoho, D. L. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2006.871582 · Cited by 23,994
Horn, R. A., & Johnson, C. R. (1985) · Cited by 22,203
Donoho, D. L. (2004) · Cited by 16,703
Horn, R. A., & Johnson, C. R. (1985) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511810817 · Cited by 10,280
Decoding by Linear Programming
Candes, E. J., & Tao, T. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2005.858979 · Cited by 7,121
Atomic Decomposition by Basis Pursuit
Chen, S. S., Donoho, D. L., & Saunders, M. A. (1998) · SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing · doi:10.1137/s1064827596304010 · Cited by 6,845
Sparse Approximate Solutions to Linear Systems
Natarajan, B. K. (1995) · SIAM Journal on Computing · doi:10.1137/s0097539792240406 · Cited by 2,783
High dimensional graphs and variable selection with the Lasso
Meinshausen, N., & Bühlmann, P. (2006) · Cited by 2,539
Cited by
Harmless interpolation of noisy data in regression
Muthukumar, V., Vodrahalli, K., & Sahai, A. (2019) · 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT) · doi:10.1109/isit.2019.8849614 · Cited by 162
Metadata
- Authors
- Wainwright, M. J.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
- Published
- 2009-12
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 5728-5741
- ISSN
- 0018-9448 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9654
- OpenAlex
- W2141556672
- Cited by
- 420
- References
- 32
- FWCI
- 40.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Information-Theoretic Limits on Sparsity Recovery in the High-Dimensional and Noisy Setting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tit.2009.2032816
- The paper
- Wainwright, M. J. (2009). Information-Theoretic Limits on Sparsity Recovery in the High-Dimensional and Noisy Setting. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. https://doi.org/10.1109/tit.2009.2032816
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.