The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Average Case Analysis of Multichannel Sparse Recovery Using Convex Relaxation
Open accessAbstract
This paper considers recovery of jointly sparse multichannel signals from incomplete measurements. Several approaches have been developed to recover the unknown sparse vectors from the given observations, including thresholding, simultaneous orthogonal matching pursuit (SOMP), and convex relaxation based on a mixed matrix norm. Typically, worst case analysis is carried out in order to analyze conditions under which the algorithms are able to recover any jointly sparse set of vectors. However, such an approach is not able to provide insights into why joint sparse recovery is superior to applying standard sparse reconstruction methods to each channel individually. Previous work considered an average case analysis of thresholding and SOMP by imposing a probability model on the measured signals. Here, the main focus is on analysis of convex relaxation techniques. In particular, the mixedl2,1approach to multichannel recovery is investigated. Under a very mild condition on the sparsity and on the dictionary characteristics, measured for example by the coherence, it is shown that the probability of recovery failure decays exponentially in the number of channels. This demonstrates that most of the time, multichannel sparse recovery is indeed superior to single channel methods. The probability bounds are valid and meaningful even for a small number of signals. Using the tools developed to analyze the convex relaxation technique, also previous bounds for thresholding and SOMP recovery are tightened.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Block-Sparse Signals: Uncertainty Relations and Efficient Recovery
Eldar, Y. C., Kuppinger, P., & Bolcskei, H. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tsp.2010.2044837 · Cited by 1,313
Self-citationRobust Recovery of Signals From a Structured Union of Subspaces
Eldar, Y. C., & Mishali, M. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2009.2030471 · Cited by 1,044
Self-citationSparse Signal Recovery With Temporally Correlated Source Vectors Using Sparse Bayesian Learning
Zhang, Z., & Rao, B. D. (2011) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/jstsp.2011.2159773 · Cited by 868
Distributed Compressive CSIT Estimation and Feedback for FDD Multi-User Massive MIMO Systems
(2014) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tsp.2014.2324991 · Cited by 685
Collaborative Sparse Regression for Hyperspectral Unmixing
Iordache, M.-D., Bioucas-Dias, J. M., & Plaza, A. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2013.2240001 · Cited by 485
Metadata
- Authors
- Eldar, Y. C., & Rauhut, H.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
- Published
- 2010-01
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 505-519
- ISSN
- 0018-9448 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9654
- OpenAlex
- W2169326247
- Cited by
- 356
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 25.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Average Case Analysis of Multichannel Sparse Recovery Using Convex Relaxation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tit.2009.2034789
- The paper
- Eldar, Y. C., & Rauhut, H. (2010). Average Case Analysis of Multichannel Sparse Recovery Using Convex Relaxation. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. https://doi.org/10.1109/tit.2009.2034789
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.