The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Robust PCA via Outlier Pursuit
Abstract
Singular-value decomposition (SVD) [and principal component analysis (PCA)] is one of the most widely used techniques for dimensionality reduction: successful and efficiently computable, it is nevertheless plagued by a well-known, well-documented sensitivity to outliers. Recent work has considered the setting where each point has a few arbitrarily corrupted components. Yet, in applications of SVD or PCA, such as robust collaborative filtering or bioinformatics, malicious agents, defective genes, or simply corrupted or contaminated experiments may effectively yield entire points that are completely corrupted. We present an efficient convex optimization-based algorithm that we call outlier pursuit, which under some mild assumptions on the uncorrupted points (satisfied, e.g., by the standard generative assumption in PCA problems) recovers the exact optimal low-dimensional subspace and identifies the corrupted points. Such identification of corrupted points that do not conform to the low-dimensional approximation is of paramount interest in bioinformatics, financial applications, and beyond. Our techniques involve matrix decomposition using nuclear norm minimization; however, our results, setup, and approach necessarily differ considerably from the existing line of work in matrix completion and matrix decomposition, since we develop an approach to recover the correct column space of the uncorrupted matrix, rather than the exact matrix itself. In any problem where one seeks to recover a structure rather than the exact initial matrices, techniques developed thus far relying on certificates of optimality will fail. We present an important extension of these methods, which allows the treatment of such problems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning
Rasmussen, C. E., & Williams, C. K. I. (2005) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/3206.001.0001 · Cited by 11,705
Huber, P. J. (1981) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471725250 · Cited by 7,066
Cited by
Zhang, F., Li, C., & Yang, F. (2019) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s19030594 · Cited by 81
Improving quality of data: IoT data aggregation using device-to-device communications
Sanyal, S., & Zhang, P. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2878640 · Cited by 51
Wood species identification using terahertz time-domain spectroscopy
Wang, Y., She, S., Zhou, N., Zhang, J., Yan, H., & Li, W. (2018) · BioResources · doi:10.15376/biores.14.1.1033-1048 · Cited by 24
Sparsity-Aware Learning and Compressed Sensing: An Overview
Theodoridis, S., Kopsinis, Y., & Slavakis, K. (2014) · Academic Press Library in Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-396502-8.00023-1 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Xu, H., Caramanis, C., & Sanghavi, S.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
- Published
- 2012-05
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 3047-3064
- ISSN
- 0018-9448 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9654
- OpenAlex
- W1995168330
- Cited by
- 445
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 42.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.