The DOI matches its Crossref record.
On the Locality of Codeword Symbols
Abstract
Consider a linear [n,k,d]qcodeC. We say that theith coordinate ofChas localityr, if the value at this coordinate can be recovered from accessing some otherrcoordinates ofC. Data storage applications require codes with small redundancy, low locality for information coordinates, large distance, and low locality for parity coordinates. In this paper, we carry out an in-depth study of the relations between these parameters. We establish a tight bound for the redundancyn-kin terms of the message length, the distance, and the locality of information coordinates. We refer to codes attaining the bound as optimal. We prove some structure theorems about optimal codes, which are particularly strong for small distances. This gives a fairly complete picture of the tradeoffs between codewords length, worst case distance, and locality of information symbols. We then consider the locality of parity check symbols and erasure correction beyond worst case distance for optimal codes. Using our structure theorem, we obtain a tight bound for the locality of parity symbols possible in such codes for a broad class of parameter settings. We prove that there is a tradeoff between having good locality and the ability to correct erasures beyond the minimum distance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Speeding Up Distributed Machine Learning Using Codes
Lee, K., Lam, M., Pedarsani, R., Papailiopoulos, D., & Ramchandran, K. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2017.2736066 · Cited by 829
The Capacity of Robust Private Information Retrieval With Colluding Databases
Sun, H., & Jafar, S. A. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2017.2777490 · Cited by 312
Optimal linear codes with a local-error-correction property
Prakash, N., Kamath, G. M., Lalitha, V., & Kumar, P. V. (2012) · 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory Proceedings · doi:10.1109/isit.2012.6284028 · Cited by 295
SoK of used cryptography in blockchain
Raikwar, M., Gligoroski, D., & Kralevska, K. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2946983 · Cited by 153
Metadata
- Authors
- Gopalan, P., Huang, C., Simitci, H., & Yekhanin, S.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
- Published
- 2012-11
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 6925-6934
- ISSN
- 0018-9448 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9654
- OpenAlex
- W1993830711
- Cited by
- 831
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 43.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the Locality of Codeword Symbols. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tit.2012.2208937
- The paper
- Gopalan, P., Huang, C., Simitci, H., & Yekhanin, S. (2012). On the Locality of Codeword Symbols. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. https://doi.org/10.1109/tit.2012.2208937
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.