Cited by 356Stochastic Gradient Optimization TechniquesNeural Networks and ApplicationsMachine Learning and Algorithms

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Theoretical Insights Into the Optimization Landscape of Over-Parameterized Shallow Neural Networks

Open access
Soltanolkotabi, Mahdi, Javanmard, Adel, Lee, Jason D.·2019·IEEE Transactions on Information Theory

Abstract

In this paper, we study the problem of learning a shallow artificial neural network that best fits a training data set. We study this problem in the over-parameterized regime where the numbers of observations are fewer than the number of parameters in the model. We show that with the quadratic activations, the optimization landscape of training, such shallow neural networks, has certain favorable characteristics that allow globally optimal models to be found efficiently using a variety of local search heuristics. This result holds for an arbitrary training data of input/output pairs. For differentiable activation functions, we also show that gradient descent, when suitably initialized, converges at a linear rate to a globally optimal model. This result focuses on a realizable model where the inputs are chosen i.i.d. from a Gaussian distribution and the labels are generated according to planted weight coefficients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tit.2018.2854560

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Larger models are 'easy' to optimize as local methods, such as SGD, converge to global minima of the training risk in over-parametrized regimes.

    “There is a growing understanding that larger models are 'easy' to optimize as local methods, such as SGD, converge to global minima of the training risk in over-parametrized regimes (e.g., [36]).”

    From Reconciling modern machine-learning practice and the classical bias–variance trade-off (2019) · cites this paper as [36]

    Section 2.1 and Remark 2.6 support global convergence of local methods in over-parameterized shallow networks, but under specific conditions: quadratic activations for the landscape result, or suitably initialized gradient descent with Gaussian inputs for the convergence result. The Related Work section cites empirical SGD results, but the paper does not establish the citing sentence’s broader claim that SGD converges to global training-risk minima across over-parameterized larger models. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 56

  1. 10.1109/IJCNN.1991.155333 · DOI
  2. polyak, 1963, Gradient methods for minimizing functionals, Zhurnal Wychislitelnoy Matematiki i Matematicheskoy Fiziki, 3, 643
  3. livni, 2014, On the computational efficiency of training neural networks, Proc Adv Neural Inf Process Syst, 855
  4. li, 2017, Convergence analysis of two-layer neural networks with relu activation
  5. li, 2017, Algorithmic regularization in over-parameterized matrix sensing and neural networks with quadratic activations
  6. levy, 2016, The power of normalization Faster evasion of saddle points
  7. nguyen, 2017, The loss surface of deep and wide neural networks
  8. 10.1007/s10107-006-0706-8 · DOI
  9. 10.1109/TASL.2011.2109382 · DOI
  10. mei, 2016, The landscape of empirical risk for non-convex losses
  11. ledoux, 2005, The Concentration of Measure Phenomenon, 89, 10.1090/surv/089 · DOI
  12. 10.1109/MSP.2017.2671158 · DOI
  13. lee, 2016, Gradient descent only converges to minimizers, Proc Conf Learn Theory, 1246
  14. 10.1007/s00365-010-9117-4 · DOI
  15. adamczak, 2015, A note on the Hanson–Wright inequality for random vectors with dependencies, Electron Commun Probab, 20, 1, 10.1214/ECP.v20-3829 · DOI
  16. hazan, 2015, Beyond convexity: Stochastic quasi-convex optimization, Proc Adv Neural Inf Process Syst, 1594
  17. jin, 2017, How to escape saddle points efficiently
  18. janzamin, 2015, Beating the perils of non-convexity Guaranteed training of neural networks using tensor methods
  19. kalai, 2009, The isotron algorithm: High-dimensional isotonic regression, Proc Conf Learning Theory (COLT)
  20. kakade, 2011, Efficient learning of generalized linear and single index models with isotonic regression, Proc Adv Neural Inf Process Syst, 927
  21. krizhevsky, 2012, ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks, Proc Adv Neural Inf Process Syst, 1097
  22. kawaguchi, 2016, Deep learning without poor local minima, Proc Adv Neural Inf Process Syst, 586
  23. vershynin, 2010, Introduction to the Non-Asymptotic Analysis of Random Matrices
  24. 10.1088/0305-4470/30/17/002 · DOI
  25. zhong, 2017, Recovery guarantees for one-hidden-layer neural networks
  26. zhang, 2016, $\ell_{1}$ -regularized neural networks are improperly learnable in polynomial time, Proc Int Conf Mach Learn, 993
  27. zhang, 2017, Convergence results for neural networks via electrodynamics
  28. zhang, 2016, Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalization
  29. xie, 2016, Diverse neural network learns true target functions
  30. wiatowski, 2017, Energy propagation in deep convolutional neural networks
  31. brutzkus, 2017, Globally optimal gradient descent for a ConvNet with Gaussian inputs
  32. 10.1109/TIT.2015.2399924 · DOI
  33. 10.1103/PhysRevE.52.4225 · DOI
  34. carmon, 2016, Gradient descent efficiently finds the cubic-regularized non-convex newton step
  35. carmon, 2016, Accelerated methods for non-convex optimization
  36. choromanska, 2015, The loss surfaces of multilayer networks, Proc AISTATS, 192
  37. 10.1145/1390156.1390177 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1007/s10107-016-1026-2 · DOI
  39. ge, 2015, Escaping from saddle points—Online stochastic gradient for tensor decomposition, Proc 28th Conf Learn Theory, 797
  40. goel, 2016, Reliably learning the ReLU in polynomial time
  41. haeffele, 2015, Global optimality in tensor factorization deep learning and beyond
  42. 10.1017/CBO9780511801334 · DOI
  43. agarwal, 2016, Finding approximate local minima faster than gradient descent
  44. bartlett, 2017, Spectrally-normalized margin bounds for neural networks
  45. 10.1007/BF00993164 · DOI
  46. blum, 1989, Training a 3-node neural network is NP-complete, Proc Adv Neural Inf Process Syst, 494
  47. 10.1088/0305-4470/29/16/005 · DOI
  48. tian, 2017, An analytical formula of population gradient for two-layered ReLU network and its applications in convergence and critical point analysis, Proc Int Conf Mach Learn (ICML), 1
  49. bölcskei, 2017, Optimal approximation with sparsely connected deep neural networks
  50. soudry, 2016, No bad local minima Data independent training error guarantees for multilayer neural networks
  51. soltanolkotabi, 2017, Structured signal recovery from quadratic measurements Breaking sample complexity barriers via nonconvex optimization
  52. telgarsky, 2016, Benefits of depth in neural networks
  53. soudry, 2017, Exponentially vanishing sub-optimal local minima in multilayer neural networks
  54. 10.1137/100806126 · DOI
  55. safran, 2017, Spurious local minima are common in two-layer ReLU neural networks
  56. soltanolkotabi, 2017, Learning ReLUs via gradient descent

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Soltanolkotabi, M., Javanmard, A., & Lee, J. D.
Affiliations
University of Southern California (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
Published
2019-02
Volume
65
Issue
2
Pages
742-769
ISSN
  • 0018-9448 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9654
OpenAlex
W2739160792
Cited by
356
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 61
FWCI
26.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Information Theory (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Simons Institute for the Theory of Computing
  • Air Force Office of Scientific Research (FA9550-18-1-0078)
  • National Science Foundation (#1813877)
  • Google
  • Northrop Grumman
  • Google Faculty Research Award
  • University of Southern California
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Algorithms
Keywords
overparameterized neural networks, shallow neural networks, optimization landscape, global optimality, local search, gradient descent convergence, linear convergence, initialization, Gaussian input

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review