Cited by 31Soft Robotics and ApplicationsMinimally Invasive Surgical TechniquesTeleoperation and Haptic Systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Miniature in vivo Robots for Remote and Harsh Environments

Rentschler, M.E., Platt, S.R., Berg, K.R., Dumpert, J., Oleynikov, D.R., Farritor, S.M.·2008·IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine

Abstract

Long-term human space exploration will require contingencies for emergency medical procedures including some capability to perform surgery. The ability to perform minimally invasive surgery (MIS) would be an important capability. The use of small incisions reduces surgical risk, but also eliminates the ability of the surgeon to view and touch the surgical environment directly. Robotic surgery, or telerobotic surgery, may provide emergency surgical care in remote or harsh environments such as space flight, or extremely forward environments such as battlefields. However, because current surgical robots are large and require extensive support personnel, their implementation has remained limited in forward environments, and they would be difficult, or impossible, to use in space flight or on battlefields. This paper presents experimental analysis of miniature fixed-base and mobile in vivo robots to support MIS surgery in remote and harsh environments. The objective is to develop wireless imaging and task-assisting robots that can be placed inside the abdominal cavity during surgery. Such robots will provide surgical task assistance and enable an on-site or remote surgeon to view the surgical environment from multiple angles. This approach is applicable to long-duration space flight, battlefield situations, and for traditional medical centers and other remote surgical locations.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/titb.2007.898017

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 33 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. boczko, 2006, microrobots in urology: video demonstration of microrobot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy and nephrectomy in a canine model, World Congr Endourol
  2. 10.1080/10929080500230197 · DOI
  3. dumpert, 0, video quality analysis of surgical robots, IEEE Sensors J

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 31

Metadata

Authors
Rentschler, M. E., Platt, S. R., Berg, K. R., Dumpert, J., Oleynikov, D. R., & Farritor, S. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Nebraska Medical Center (US)
  • University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine
Published
2008-01
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
66-75
ISSN
1089-7771 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2133333463
Cited by
31
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  • University of Nebraska Medical Center
  • University of Utah
  • National Space Biomedical Research Institute
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
  • University of North Carolina Wilmington
  • NOAA Research
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Soft Robotics and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Teleoperation and Haptic Systems
Keywords
telesurgery, minimally invasive surgery, extreme environments, space medicine, battlefield medicine, wireless imaging
MeSH terms
Humans, Miniaturization, Robotics, Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review