EMG and EPP-integrated human-machine interface between the paralyzed and rehabilitation exoskeleton
Abstract
Although a lower extremity exoskeleton shows great prospect in the rehabilitation of the lower limb, it has not yet been widely applied to the clinical rehabilitation of the paralyzed. This is partly caused by insufficient information interactions between the paralyzed and existing exoskeleton that cannot meet the requirements of harmonious control. In this research, a bidirectional human-machine interface including a neurofuzzy controller and an extended physiological proprioception (EPP) feedback system is developed by imitating the biological closed-loop control system of human body. The neurofuzzy controller is built to decode human motion in advance by the fusion of the fuzzy electromyographic signals reflecting human motion intention and the precise proprioception providing joint angular feedback information. It transmits control information from human to exoskeleton, while the EPP feedback system based on haptic stimuli transmits motion information of the exoskeleton back to the human. Joint angle and torque information are transmitted in the form of air pressure to the human body. The real-time bidirectional human-machine interface can help a patient with lower limb paralysis to control the exoskeleton with his/her healthy side and simultaneously perceive motion on the paralyzed side by EPP. The interface rebuilds a closed-loop motion control system for paralyzed patients and realizes harmonious control of the human-machine system.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A human-machine interface between a paralyzed individual and rehabilitation exoskeleton was developed by Shanghai Jiao Tong University to help patients with lower limb paralysis.
“a human–machine interface between a paralyzed individual and rehabilitation exoskeleton was developed by Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Shanghai, China) to help patients with lower limb paralysis [45].”
From Recent developments and challenges of lower extremity exoskeletons (2016) · cites this paper as [45]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 32 · Cited by 197
- Authors
- Yin, Y. H., Fan, Y. J., & Xu, L. D.
- Affiliations
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
- University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine
- Published
- 2012-07
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 542-549
- ISSN
- 1089-7771 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0032
- OpenAlex
- W2092623288
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 14.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
- Keywords
- lower limb exoskeleton, paraplegia, human-machine interaction, electromyography, bidirectional control, haptic feedback, motor intention decoding, rehabilitation, closed-loop motion control
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Artificial Limbs, Electromyography, Humans, Male, Man-Machine Systems, Paraplegia, Proprioception, Robotics, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, User-Computer Interface, Neural Networks, Computer, Fuzzy Logic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review