The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Development and Evaluation of a Cooperative Vehicle Intersection Control Algorithm Under the Connected Vehicles Environment
Abstract
Under the Connected Vehicles (CV) environment, it is possible to create a Cooperative Vehicle Intersection Control (CVIC) system that enables cooperation between vehicles and infrastructure for effective intersection operations and management when all vehicles are fully automated. Assuming such a CVIC environment, this paper proposed a CVIC algorithm that does not require a traffic signal. The CVIC algorithm was designed to manipulate individual vehicles' maneuvers so that vehicles can safely cross the intersection without colliding with other vehicles. By eliminating the potential overlaps of vehicular trajectories coming from all conflicting approaches at the intersection, the CVIC algorithm seeks a safe maneuver for every vehicle approaching the intersection and manipulates each of them. An additional algorithm was designed to deal with the system failure cases resulting from inevitable trajectory overlaps at the intersection and infeasible solutions. A simulation-based case study implemented on a hypothetical four-way single-lane approach intersection under varying congestion conditions showed that the CVIC algorithm significantly improved intersection performance compared with conventional actuated intersection control: 99% and 33% of stop delay and total travel time reductions, respectively, were achieved. In addition, the CVIC algorithm significantly improved air quality and energy savings: 44% reductions of CO2and 44% savings of fuel consumption.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Review of Motion Planning Techniques for Automated Vehicles
Gonzalez, D., Perez, J., Milanes, V., & Nashashibi, F. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2015.2498841 · Cited by 1,670
Using connected vehicle technology to improve the efficiency of intersections
Ilgin Guler, S., Menendez, M., & Meier, L. (2014) · Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.trc.2014.05.008 · Cited by 481
Siegel, J. E., Erb, D. C., & Sarma, S. E. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2017.2749459 · Cited by 455
Cooperative Collision Avoidance at Intersections: Algorithms and Experiments
Hafner, M. R., Cunningham, D., Caminiti, L., & Del Vecchio, D. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2013.2252901 · Cited by 301
Recent advances in connected and automated vehicles
Elliott, D., Keen, W., & Miao, L. (2019) · Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition) · doi:10.1016/j.jtte.2018.09.005 · Cited by 253
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, J., & Park, B.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems
- Published
- 2012-03
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 81-90
- ISSN
- 1524-9050 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0016
- OpenAlex
- W2008082561
- Cited by
- 762
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 35.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development and Evaluation of a Cooperative Vehicle Intersection Control Algorithm Under the Connected Vehicles Environment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tits.2011.2178836
- The paper
- Lee, J., & Park, B. (2012). Development and Evaluation of a Cooperative Vehicle Intersection Control Algorithm Under the Connected Vehicles Environment. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/tits.2011.2178836
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.