The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparing Optimal Relocation Operations With Simulated Relocation Policies in One-Way Carsharing Systems
Open accessAbstract
One-way carsharing systems allow travelers to pick up a car at one station and return it to a different station, thereby causing vehicle imbalances across the stations. In this paper, a way to mitigate that imbalance is discussed, which is relocating vehicles between stations. For this purpose, two methods are presented, i.e., a new mathematical model to optimize the relocation operations that maximize the profitability of a carsharing service and a simulation model to study different real-time relocation policies. Both methods were applied to networks of stations in Lisbon, Portugal. Results show that relocating vehicles, using any of the methods developed, can produce significant increases in profit. For instance, in the case where the carsharing system provides maximum coverage of the city area, the imbalances in the network resulted in an operating loss of C1160/day when no relocation operations were performed. When relocation policies were applied, however, the simulation results indicate that profits of C854/day could be achieved, even with increased costs due to relocations. Using the mathematical model, the results are even better, with a reached profit of C3865.7/day. This improvement was achieved through reductions in the number of vehicles needed to satisfy the demand and the number of parking spaces needed at stations. These results demonstrate the importance of relocation operations for profitably providing a network of stations in one-way carsharing systems that covers the entire city, thus reaching a higher number of users.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
An optimization framework for the development of efficient one-way car-sharing systems
Boyacı, B., Zografos, K. G., & Geroliminis, N. (2015) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2014.07.020 · Cited by 441
Car-sharing services: An annotated review
Ferrero, F., Perboli, G., Rosano, M., & Vesco, A. (2018) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2017.09.020 · Cited by 319
Enhanced Mobility With Connectivity and Automation: A Review of Shared Autonomous Vehicle Systems
Zhao, L., & Malikopoulos, A. A. (2022) · IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine · doi:10.1109/mits.2019.2953526 · Cited by 93
On the Values of Vehicle-to-Grid Electricity Selling in Electric Vehicle Sharing
Zhang, Y., Lu, M., & Shen, S. (2020) · Manufacturing & Service Operations Management · doi:10.1287/msom.2019.0855 · Cited by 78
Weak signals in the mobility landscape: car sharing in ten European cities
Boldrini, C., Bruno, R., & Laarabi, M. H. (2019) · EPJ Data Science · doi:10.1140/epjds/s13688-019-0186-8 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Jorge, D., Correia, G. H. A., & Barnhart, C.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems
- Published
- 2014-08
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1667-1675
- ISSN
- 1524-9050 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0016
- OpenAlex
- W584016428
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparing Optimal Relocation Operations With Simulated Relocation Policies in One-Way Carsharing Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tits.2014.2304358
- The paper
- Jorge, D., Correia, G. H. A., & Barnhart, C. (2014). Comparing Optimal Relocation Operations With Simulated Relocation Policies in One-Way Carsharing Systems. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/tits.2014.2304358
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.