Cited by 94Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)Traffic control and managementTraffic Prediction and Management Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Information Dissemination Delay in Vehicle-to-Vehicle Communication Networks in a Traffic Stream

Du, Lili, Dao, Hoang·2015·IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems

Abstract

Vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) communication networks, as one of the core components of connected vehicle systems, have been granted many promising applications to address traffic mobility, safety, and sustainability. However, only a limited amount of work has been completed to understand the fundamental properties of information propagation in such systems, while comprehensively considering traffic and communication reality. Motivated by this view, this proposed research develops analytical formulations to estimate information propagation time delay via a V2V communication network formed on a one-way or two-way road segment with multiple lanes. Distinguished to previous efforts, the proposed study carefully involves several critical communication and traffic flow features in reality, such as wireless communication interference, intermittent information transmission, and dynamic traffic flow. Moreover, this study elaborately analyzes the interactions between information and traffic flow under sparse and congested traffic flow conditions. The numerical experiments based on Next-Generation Simulation field data illustrate that the proposed analytical formulations are able to provide very good estimation, with the relative error less than 5%, for the information propagation time delay on a one-way or two-way road segment under various traffic conditions. The proposed work can be further extended to characterize information propagation time delay and coverage over local transportation networks.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tits.2014.2326331

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. 2013, Virginia Department of Transportation
  2. 2013, Free GPS Navigation Turn by Turn-Waze
  3. 10.2307/2687013 · DOI
  4. 0, California Partners for Advanced Transit and Highways (PATH)
  5. 0, Fleetnet (Internet on the road)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 94

Metadata

Authors
Du, L., & Dao, H.
Affiliations
Illinois Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems
Published
2015-02
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
66-80
ISSN
  • 1524-9050 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0016
OpenAlex
W2040204314
Cited by
94
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 1
FWCI
3.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems (publishedVersion)
Funders
NSF (1436786)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Traffic control and management
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques
Keywords
vehicle-to-vehicle communication, connected vehicles, traffic flow, wireless interference, traffic congestion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review