The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Real-Time Detection of Traffic From Twitter Stream Analysis
Open accessAbstract
Social networks have been recently employed as a source of information for event detection, with particular reference to road traffic congestion and car accidents. In this paper, we present a real-time monitoring system for traffic event detection from Twitter stream analysis. The system fetches tweets from Twitter according to several search criteria; processes tweets, by applying text mining techniques; and finally performs the classification of tweets. The aim is to assign the appropriate class label to each tweet, as related to a traffic event or not. The traffic detection system was employed for real-time monitoring of several areas of the Italian road network, allowing for detection of traffic events almost in real time, often before online traffic news web sites. We employed the support vector machine as a classification model, and we achieved an accuracy value of 95.75% by solving a binary classification problem (traffic versus nontraffic tweets). We were also able to discriminate if traffic is caused by an external event or not, by solving a multiclass classification problem and obtaining an accuracy value of 88.89%.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. (1995) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00994018 · Cited by 59,421
The WEKA data mining software: an update
Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P., & Witten, I. H. (2009) · ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter · doi:10.1145/1656274.1656278 · Cited by 17,750
Nearest neighbor pattern classification
Cover, T., & Hart, P. (1967) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.1967.1053964 · Cited by 16,936
Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods
Wilcoxon, F. (1945) · Biometrics Bulletin · doi:10.2307/3001968 · Cited by 15,354
What is Twitter, a social network or a news media?
Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., & Moon, S. (2010) · Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web · doi:10.1145/1772690.1772751 · Cited by 6,652
Measurement and analysis of online social networks
Mislove, A., Marcon, M., Gummadi, K. P., Druschel, P., & Bhattacharjee, B. (2007) · Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement · doi:10.1145/1298306.1298311 · Cited by 3,057
Cited by
Parallel Transportation Systems: Toward IoT-Enabled Smart Urban Traffic Control and Management
Zhu, F., Lv, Y., Chen, Y., Wang, X., Xiong, G., & Wang, F.-Y. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2019.2934991 · Cited by 375
Machine learning algorithms for social media analysis: A survey
T.K., B., Annavarapu, C. S. R., & Bablani, A. (2021) · Computer Science Review · doi:10.1016/j.cosrev.2021.100395 · Cited by 276
A Survey on an Emerging Area: Deep Learning for Smart City Data
Chen, Q., Wang, W., Wu, F., De, S., Wang, R., Zhang, B., & Huang, X. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tetci.2019.2907718 · Cited by 167
Metadata
- Authors
- D'Andrea, E., Ducange, P., Lazzerini, B., & Marcelloni, F.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems
- Published
- 2015-08
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 2269-2283
- ISSN
- 1524-9050 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0016
- OpenAlex
- W1989597542
- Cited by
- 330
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 54.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Real-Time Detection of Traffic From Twitter Stream Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tits.2015.2404431
- The paper
- D'Andrea, E., Ducange, P., Lazzerini, B., & Marcelloni, F. (2015). Real-Time Detection of Traffic From Twitter Stream Analysis. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/tits.2015.2404431
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.