Cited by 427Autonomous Vehicle Technology and SafetyAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsVideo Surveillance and Tracking Methods

Vehicle Detection Techniques for Collision Avoidance Systems: A Review

Mukhtar, Amir, Xia, Likun, Tang, Tong Boon·2015·IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems

Abstract

Over the past decade, vision-based vehicle detection techniques for road safety improvement have gained an increasing amount of attention. Unfortunately, the techniques suffer from robustness due to huge variability in vehicle shape (particularly for motorcycles), cluttered environment, various illumination conditions, and driving behavior. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive survey in a systematic approach about the state-of-the-art on-road vision-based vehicle detection and tracking systems for collision avoidance systems (CASs). This paper is structured based on a vehicle detection processes starting from sensor selection to vehicle detection and tracking. Techniques in each process/step are reviewed and analyzed individually. Two main contributions in this paper are the following: survey on motorcycle detection techniques and the sensor comparison in terms of cost and range parameters. Finally, the survey provides an optimal choice with a low cost and reliable CAS design in vehicle industries.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tits.2015.2409109

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Because of low power consumption and low cost, a large number of roadside WSNs may be strategically positioned to help vehicle communication technology.

    “Because of its low power consumption and low cost, a large number of roadside WSNs may be strategically positioned to help vehicle communication technology [48].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mukhtar, A., Xia, L., & Tang, T. B.
Affiliations
  • Universiti Teknologi Petronas (MY)
  • Beijing Institute of Technology (CN)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems
Published
2015-10
Volume
16
Issue
5
Pages
2318-2338
ISSN
  • 1524-9050 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0016
OpenAlex
W2088173505
Cited by
427
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 2
FWCI
33.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MOSTI), Malaysia (03-02-02-SF0151)
  • Ministry of Education, Malaysia (HiCOE grant)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
Keywords
vehicle detection, collision avoidance systems, vision-based detection, vehicle tracking, motorcycle detection, road safety, sensor selection, cluttered environments, illumination variation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review