The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Real-Time Charging Station Recommendation System for Electric-Vehicle Taxis
Abstract
Electric vehicle (EV) taxis have been introduced into the public transportation systems to increase EV market penetration. Different from regular taxis that can refuel in minutes, EV taxis' recharging cycles can be as long as one hour. Due to the long cycle, the bad decision on the charging station, i.e., choosing one without empty charging piles, may lead to a long waiting time of more than an hour in the worst case. Therefore, choosing the right charging station is very important to reduce the overall waiting time. Considering that the waiting time can be a nonnegligible portion to the total work hours, the decision will naturally affect the revenue of individual EV taxis. The current practice of a taxi driver is to choose a station heuristically without a global knowledge. However, the heuristical choice can be a bad one that leads to more waiting time. Such cases can be easily observed in current collected taxi data in Shenzhen, China. Our analysis shows that there exists a large room for improvement in the extra waiting time as large as 30 min/driver. In this paper, we provide a real-time charging station recommendation system for EV taxis via large-scale GPS data mining. By combining each EV taxi's historical recharging events and real-time GPS trajectories, the current operational state of each taxi is predicted. Based on this information, for an EV taxi requesting a recommendation, we can recommend a charging station that leads to the minimal total time before its recharging starts. Extensive experiments verified that our predicted time is relatively accurate and can reduce the cost time of EV taxis by 50% in Shenzhen.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Huang, X., Xu, C., Wang, P., & Liu, H. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2812176 · Cited by 319
Self-citationSmart electric vehicle charging management for smart cities
Vaidya, B., & Mouftah, H. T. (2020) · IET Smart Cities · doi:10.1049/iet-smc.2019.0076 · Cited by 65
Optimal location of PEVCSs using MAS and ER approach
Jiang, C., Jing, Z., Ji, T., & Wu, Q. (2018) · IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution · doi:10.1049/iet-gtd.2017.1907 · Cited by 24
Recharging systems and business operations to improve the economics of electrified taxi fleets
Hsieh, I.-Y. L., Nunes, A., Pan, M. S., & Green, W. H. (2020) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2020.102119 · Cited by 16
Coordinating matching, rebalancing and charging of electric ride-hailing fleet under hybrid requests
Yu, X., Zhu, Z., Mao, H., Hua, M., Li, D., Chen, J., & Xu, H. (2023) · Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.trd.2023.103903 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Tian, Z., Jung, T., Wang, Y., Zhang, F., Tu, L., Xu, C., Tian, C., & Li, X.-Y.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems
- Published
- 2016-11
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3098-3109
- ISSN
- 1524-9050 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0016
- OpenAlex
- W2336603544
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Real-Time Charging Station Recommendation System for Electric-Vehicle Taxis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tits.2016.2539201
- The paper
- Tian, Z., Jung, T., Wang, Y., Zhang, F., Tu, L., Xu, C., Tian, C., & Li, X.-Y. (2016). Real-Time Charging Station Recommendation System for Electric-Vehicle Taxis. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/tits.2016.2539201
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.