The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lane Change Maneuvers for Automated Vehicles
Abstract
By considering a lane change maneuver as primarily a longitudinal motion planning problem, this paper presents a lane change maneuver algorithm with a pragmatic approach to determine an inter-vehicle traffic gap and time instance to perform the maneuver. The proposed approach selects an appropriate inter-vehicle traffic gap and time instance to perform the lane change maneuver by simply estimating whether there might exist a longitudinal trajectory that allows the automated vehicle to safely perform the maneuver. The lane change maneuver algorithm then proceeds to solve two loosely coupled convex quadratic programs to obtain the longitudinal trajectory to position the automated vehicle in the selected inter-vehicle traffic gap at the desired time instance and the corresponding lateral trajectory. Simulation results demonstrate the capability of the proposed approach to select an appropriate inter-vehicle traffic gap and time instance to initialize the lateral motion of a lane change maneuver in various traffic scenarios. The real-time ability of the lane change maneuver algorithm to generate safe and smooth trajectories is shown by experimental results of a Volvo V60 performing automated lane change maneuvers on a test track.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Such collisions can be avoided by selecting an inter-vehicle traffic gap and time instance via a novel lane change maneuver algorithm in mixed highway traffic with human drivers and AVs with or without V2V and V2I communication, or in an AV-only environment through vehicle-to-vehicle communication.
“This sort of collisions can be avoided by selecting an inter-vehicle traffic gap and time instance to perform the lane change maneuver by executing a novel lane change maneuver algorithm in a mixed highway traffic environment with both human drivers and AVs with or without V2V and V2I communication”
From Understanding autonomous vehicles: A systematic literature review on capability, impact, planning and policy (2019) · cites this paper as Nilsson et al., 2017
Lane changing maneuver is the riskiest component added to the advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) of an AV.
“the riskiest component added to the advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) of an AV is lane changing maneuver.”
From Understanding autonomous vehicles: A systematic literature review on capability, impact, planning and policy (2019) · cites this paper as Nilsson et al., 2017
Lack of determining a safe inter-vehicle gap and time instance to perform a lane change causes oscillation, travel delay and capacity reduction in traffic flow.
“due to lack of determining a safe inter-vehicle gap and time instance to perform the maneuver, there exists oscillation, travel delay and capacity reduction in traffic flow”
From Understanding autonomous vehicles: A systematic literature review on capability, impact, planning and policy (2019) · cites this paper as Nilsson et al., 2017
Citations
Cites
Making Bertha Drive—An Autonomous Journey on a Historic Route
Ziegler, J., Bender, P., Schreiber, M., Lategahn, H., Strauss, T., Stiller, C., Dang, T., Franke, U., Appenrodt, N., Keller, C. G., et al. (2014) · IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine · doi:10.1109/mits.2014.2306552 · Cited by 854
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 20
- 10.1109/TVT.2004.833625 · DOI
- 10.1504/IJVAS.2010.035796 · DOI
- 10.1243/09544070JAUTO1204 · DOI
- 10.1109/ACC.2012.6315303 · DOI
- 10.1109/IVS.2015.7225752 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11081-011-9176-9 · DOI
- 10.1109/MITS.2016.2565718 · DOI
- nilsson, 0, Manoeuvre generation and control for automated highway driving, Proc World Congr Int Fed Autom Control, 6301
- 10.1186/s40648-014-0001-z · DOI
- 10.1109/MITS.2013.2278405 · DOI
- 10.1109/TVT.2014.2369522 · DOI
- maciejowski, 2002, Predictive Control with Constraints
- 10.1109/TRO.2014.2312453 · DOI
- 10.1109/ACC.2015.7170929 · DOI
- rawlings, 2009, Model Predictive Control Theory and Design
- 10.1049/iet-its:20060081 · DOI
- 10.1109/TITS.2015.2504718 · DOI
- 10.1109/MITS.2014.2357038 · DOI
- anderson, 1989, Optimal Control Linear Quadratic Methods
- 10.1016/j.conengprac.2015.04.006 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Faisal, A., Yigitcanlar, T., Kamruzzaman, M., & Currie, G. (2019) · Journal of Transport and Land Use · doi:10.5198/jtlu.2019.1405 · Cited by 427
“During the lane change attempt by a human driver, there are possibilities of collision with at least four vehicles—front and rear vehicles in the same lane, and front and following vehicles in the target lane (Bai, Quan, Fu, Gan, & Wang, 2017; Nilsson et al., 2017).”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Nilsson, J., Brannstrom, M., Coelingh, E., & Fredriksson, J.
- Affiliations
- Volvo (Sweden) (SE)
- Chalmers University of Technology (SE)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems
- Published
- 2017-05
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1087-1096
- ISSN
- 1524-9050 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0016
- OpenAlex
- W2517236235
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 9
- FWCI
- 20.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems (publishedVersion)
- Chalmers Publication Library (Chalmers University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Chalmers Research (Chalmers University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- FFI—Strategic Vehicle Research and Innovation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Vehicle Dynamics and Control Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Traffic control and management
- Keywords
- lane changing, autonomous vehicles, convex quadratic programming, trajectory generation, real-time control
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review