Cited by 227Autonomous Vehicle Technology and SafetyVehicle Dynamics and Control SystemsTraffic control and management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Lane Change Maneuvers for Automated Vehicles

Nilsson, Julia, Brannstrom, Mattias, Coelingh, Erik, Fredriksson, Jonas·2017·IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems

Abstract

By considering a lane change maneuver as primarily a longitudinal motion planning problem, this paper presents a lane change maneuver algorithm with a pragmatic approach to determine an inter-vehicle traffic gap and time instance to perform the maneuver. The proposed approach selects an appropriate inter-vehicle traffic gap and time instance to perform the lane change maneuver by simply estimating whether there might exist a longitudinal trajectory that allows the automated vehicle to safely perform the maneuver. The lane change maneuver algorithm then proceeds to solve two loosely coupled convex quadratic programs to obtain the longitudinal trajectory to position the automated vehicle in the selected inter-vehicle traffic gap at the desired time instance and the corresponding lateral trajectory. Simulation results demonstrate the capability of the proposed approach to select an appropriate inter-vehicle traffic gap and time instance to initialize the lateral motion of a lane change maneuver in various traffic scenarios. The real-time ability of the lane change maneuver algorithm to generate safe and smooth trajectories is shown by experimental results of a Volvo V60 performing automated lane change maneuvers on a test track.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tits.2016.2597966

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Such collisions can be avoided by selecting an inter-vehicle traffic gap and time instance via a novel lane change maneuver algorithm in mixed highway traffic with human drivers and AVs with or without V2V and V2I communication, or in an AV-only environment through vehicle-to-vehicle communication.

    “This sort of collisions can be avoided by selecting an inter-vehicle traffic gap and time instance to perform the lane change maneuver by executing a novel lane change maneuver algorithm in a mixed highway traffic environment with both human drivers and AVs with or without V2V and V2I communication”
  • Lane changing maneuver is the riskiest component added to the advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) of an AV.

    “the riskiest component added to the advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) of an AV is lane changing maneuver.”
  • Lack of determining a safe inter-vehicle gap and time instance to perform a lane change causes oscillation, travel delay and capacity reduction in traffic flow.

    “due to lack of determining a safe inter-vehicle gap and time instance to perform the maneuver, there exists oscillation, travel delay and capacity reduction in traffic flow”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. 10.1109/TVT.2004.833625 · DOI
  2. 10.1504/IJVAS.2010.035796 · DOI
  3. 10.1243/09544070JAUTO1204 · DOI
  4. 10.1109/ACC.2012.6315303 · DOI
  5. 10.1109/IVS.2015.7225752 · DOI
  6. 10.1007/s11081-011-9176-9 · DOI
  7. 10.1109/MITS.2016.2565718 · DOI
  8. nilsson, 0, Manoeuvre generation and control for automated highway driving, Proc World Congr Int Fed Autom Control, 6301
  9. 10.1186/s40648-014-0001-z · DOI
  10. 10.1109/MITS.2013.2278405 · DOI
  11. 10.1109/TVT.2014.2369522 · DOI
  12. maciejowski, 2002, Predictive Control with Constraints
  13. 10.1109/TRO.2014.2312453 · DOI
  14. 10.1109/ACC.2015.7170929 · DOI
  15. rawlings, 2009, Model Predictive Control Theory and Design
  16. 10.1049/iet-its:20060081 · DOI
  17. 10.1109/TITS.2015.2504718 · DOI
  18. 10.1109/MITS.2014.2357038 · DOI
  19. anderson, 1989, Optimal Control Linear Quadratic Methods
  20. 10.1016/j.conengprac.2015.04.006 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Nilsson, J., Brannstrom, M., Coelingh, E., & Fredriksson, J.
Affiliations
  • Volvo (Sweden) (SE)
  • Chalmers University of Technology (SE)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems
Published
2017-05
Volume
18
Issue
5
Pages
1087-1096
ISSN
  • 1524-9050 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0016
OpenAlex
W2517236235
Cited by
227
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 9
FWCI
20.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems (publishedVersion)
  • Chalmers Publication Library (Chalmers University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Chalmers Research (Chalmers University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
FFI—Strategic Vehicle Research and Innovation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Vehicle Dynamics and Control Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Traffic control and management
Keywords
lane changing, autonomous vehicles, convex quadratic programming, trajectory generation, real-time control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review