Cited by 176Vehicle License Plate RecognitionHandwritten Text Recognition TechniquesAdvanced Neural Network Applications

Effective Uyghur Language Text Detection in Complex Background Images for Traffic Prompt Identification

Yan, Chenggang, Xie, Hongtao, Liu, Shun, Yin, Jian, Zhang, Yongdong, Dai, Qionghai·2018·IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems

Abstract

Text detection in complex background images is a challenging task for intelligent vehicles. Actually, almost all the widely-used systems focus on commonly used languages while for some minority languages, such as the Uyghur language, text detection is paid less attention. In this paper, we propose an effective Uyghur language text detection system in complex background images. First, a new channel-enhanced maximally stable extremal regions (MSERs) algorithm is put forward to detect component candidates. Second, a two-layer filtering mechanism is designed to remove most non-character regions. Third, the remaining component regions are connected into short chains, and the short chains are extended by a novel extension algorithm to connect the missed MSERs. Finally, a two-layer chain elimination filter is proposed to prune the non-text chains. To evaluate the system, we build a new data set by various Uyghur texts with complex backgrounds. Extensive experimental comparisons show that our system is obviously effective for Uyghur language text detection in complex background images. The F-measure is 85%, which is much better than the state-of-the-art performance of 75.5%.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tits.2017.2749977

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The sparse-sampling strategy causes contents within frames to be less correlated, especially for long videos, implying that feature distributions are quite different.

    “Firstly, the sparse-sampling strategy is usually adopted when tackling video representation learning to reduce the training costs [21].The contents within those frames are less correlated, especially for the cases of long videos, implying the features in terms of distributions are quite different [22], [23].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yan, C., Xie, H., Liu, S., Yin, J., Zhang, Y., & Dai, Q.
Affiliations
  • Hangzhou Dianzi University (CN)
  • University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
  • Shandong University (CN)
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems
Published
2018-01
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
220-229
ISSN
  • 1524-9050 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0016
OpenAlex
W2762383441
Cited by
176
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 82 · 2017: 25
FWCI
35.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Nature Science Foundation of China (61771468, 61525206, 61671196, 61327902)
  • Zhejiang Province Nature Science Foundation of China (LR17F030006)
  • Youth Innovation Promotion Association Chinese Academy of Sciences (2017209)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Vehicle License Plate Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
Uyghur language, text detection, complex background images, MSER, intelligent vehicles, traffic sign recognition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review